Overview

For two thousand years, Western thought has separated art and science as distinct enterprises with different methods, audiences, and standards for success. The Scientific Aesthetic argues this division is wrong, and offers a single test that distinguishes genuine work in either field from its counterfeits. The originating-act test has four components. Priority asks whether something was there before the act, or whether the act brought it into being. Preservation concerns whether what the act creates persists through time, available to later inspection. Consciousness points to whether the agent was attempting something specific. Granularity names the scale of resolution at which the work declares itself. By this test, Niépce's heliograph at Le Gras counts as originating work on all four measures. Cézanne's Mont Sainte-Victoire qualifies likewise. So do the Watson and Crick double helix and Beethoven's late string quartets. Most things called creative or scientific do not. Across ten chapters, David Boles applies the test to architecture, music, painting, photography, theater, mathematics, biology, and physics. He works through the priority disputes that pit Niépce against Daguerre, the workshop apprenticeship system that produced canon while the canon claimed solitary genius, the moment when photography forced painting to abandon its imitative project, and the question of what counts as art when machines that know nothing can produce works the eye accepts as beautiful. The result is a working theory of how the originating act produces a thing that survives, and how to recognize that surviving work amid the merely produced. This is a book for anyone who has wondered whether what they were looking at was real, whether the praise an artist or scientist received was earned, or whether the gap between art's mystique and science's discipline is a gap at all.

Full Product Details

9798195143381

Table of Contents

Reviews

Author Information

Tab Content 6

Countries Available