|
|
|||
|
||||
OverviewAlthough the Supreme Court has historically resisted a partisan sorting out of its public legitimacy, today, Republicans and Democrats look at the Court in very different ways. This Element assembles original survey and experimental data to unpack these changes in three ways. First, the authors illustrate the powerful role that partisanship plays in shaping judicial public opinion. Second, they validate a new three-item measure of specific support and show that it reliably predicts perceptions of Supreme Court legitimacy. Finally, they introduce a new, applied measure of support for the rule of law and connect it to specific and diffuse support. Taken as a whole, their work demonstrates that large chunks of the mass public view the Supreme Court critically. Looking ahead, it is unclear whether legitimacy will rebound when citizens perceive that the balance of judicial power within the nation's High Court has fractured along party lines. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Nicholas T. Davis (University of Alabama) , Matthew P. Hitt (Colorado State University)Publisher: Cambridge University Press Imprint: Cambridge University Press Weight: 0.153kg ISBN: 9781009613453ISBN 10: 1009613456 Pages: 96 Publication Date: 30 April 2026 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Paperback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Manufactured on demand We will order this item for you from a manufactured on demand supplier. Table of ContentsIntroduction; 1. A systems theory for changing times; 2. The sorting out of supreme court legitimacy; 3. Linking specific support to legitimacy; 4. Support for the rule of law and the supreme court; Conclusion: a fragile status Quo; Appendix; References.ReviewsAuthor InformationTab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |
||||