Overview

America's wars after the 9/11 attacks were marked by a political obsession with terrorist 'sanctuaries' and 'safe havens'. From mountain redoubts in Afghanistan to the deserts of Iraq, Washington's policy-makers maintained an unwavering focus on finding and destroying the refuges, bases and citadels of modern guerrilla movements, and holding their sponsors to account. This was a preoccupation embedded in nearly every official speech and document of the time, a corpus of material that offered a new logic for thinking about the world. As an exercise in political communication, it was a spectacular success. From 2001 to 2009, President George W. Bush and his closest advisors set terms of reference that cascaded down from the White House, through government and into the hearts and minds of Americans. 'Sanctuary' was the red thread running through all of it, permeating the decisions and discourses of the day. Where did this obsession come from? How did it become such an important feature of American political life? In this new political history, Michael A. Innes explores precedents, from Saigon to Baghdad, and traces how decision-makers and their advisors used ideas of sanctuary to redefine American foreign policy, national security, and enemies real and imagined.

Full Product Details

9780197567128

Table of Contents

Reviews

Michael Innes perceptively illuminates a construct that shaped the last twenty years of war, with tragic implications for millions of people, but which few have ever heard of. If you want to understand how the War on Terror went so awry, read this book. -- David Kilcullen, author of The Accidental Guerrilla and The Dragons and the Snakes In the aftermath of 9/11, the US military and CIA launched an unprecedented, 20 year sanctuary denial campaign that saw hundreds of thousands of troops and operatives deployed across the globe. But, even as CIA drone fleets wiped out Al Qaeda and Special Forces hunted ISIS insurgents in the ungoverned spaces , it became apparent that the Pentagon had not begun to truly understand the underlying basis for America's entire war and counter-terrorism effort; the concept of sanctuary. It is with the aim of chronicling, for the first time, the fundamental notion of sanctuary in America's wars that Innes takes readers on a truly ground-breaking and riveting journey into the history of this concept that launched the superpower's longest conflict. This story begins unexpectedly in the jungles of Vietnam in the 1960s and extends all the way to the hallways of power in Trump's Washington D.C. -- Brian Glyn Williams, Author of Counter Jihad and former CIA Counter-Terrorism Center analyst A timely, policy-relevant work that performs a tremendous service by arguing that rhetoric matters when it comes to war. In a series of insightful case studies, Innes perceptively examines how policymakers and military leaders define terrorist sanctuaries and safe havens, often in ways that undermine their own national security objectives. -- Gregory A. Daddis, USS Midway Chair in Modern U.S. Military History, San Diego State University Soldier-scholar Michael Innes' Streets Without Joy is an especially timely and important contribution to the literature. His first-hand experience coupled with his grasp and analysis of the historical salience of this issue as well as its relevance to contemporary conflicts, is as original as it is insightful. -- Professor Bruce Hoffman, Georgetown University and author of Inside Terrorism Despite their critical importance in armed conflicts, wartime sanctuaries rarely receive the scholarly scrutiny the topic deserves. In this highly readable book, Innes connects the dots with his fine analysis of half a century of US wartime sanctuary discourses, offering much new insight into a highly policy-relevant theme. -- Brynjar Lia, Professor of Middle East Studies, University of Oslo In Streets Without Joy, Michael Innes combines applied history and theory to explore how the dominant discourses of rebel sanctuaries and terrorist safe havens shaped the way in which the US waged war in the 9/11 era. The writing is compelling, and the author's constant attention to methodology and sense of time and place are deeply impressive. Not only is this intellectually ambitious book a fitting tribute to Bernard Fall, whose life and work inspired the author's own journey from practitioner to scholar; it is a singular achievement in its own right, one that demands the attention of every scholar of modern warfare. -- Professor Joe Maiolo, King's College London Extremely readable, lucidly stated and focused, Innes' analysis is enhanced by a sharp eye for concrete situations and an ear for the voices of people he has met up with in the course of his career. This book not only traces the history of sanctuaries since the Second World War it also offers a penetrating analysis of our own world of frontlines, back alleys and safe and not-so-safe spaces that defy sovereign jurisdiction. -- Professor Christopher Coker, London School of Economics Innes' important book explores an understudied element of American foreign policy discourse. The author illustrates that the post-9/11 rhetoric about enemy sanctuaries in Afghanistan and Iraq was far from new; instead it drew on a long history that was both deeply embedded in and had a significant impact on policymaking. -- Andrew Priest, Department of History, University of Essex Michael Innes provides an authoritative investigation into the origins, multiple meanings, use and abuse of Americas post-9/11 sanctuary discourse. Original and compelling, this book provokes numerous trains of thought that will serve to fertilise many new fields of War on Terrorism scholarship -- Dr Jeffrey Michaels, Senior Fellow, Barcelona Institute of International Studies Michael Innes' book on sanctuaries is an indispensable guide to an issue that has been central to the wars and security debates of the past generation - and will continue to be in future. -- Anatol Lieven, author of Pakistan: A Hard Country A masterful account of how streets without joy are bordered by offices where thought is locally instrumental, language elides, and truth is elsewhere. In demonstrating problems endemic to bureaucracies (including universities), Innes suggests how the US can fight so long and so aimlessly. Quite literally surreal, illuminating, and depressing.' -- David A. Westbrook, author of Getting Through Security: Counterterrorism, Bureaucracy, and a Sense of the Modern (with Mark Maguire), and Deploying Ourselves: Islamist Violence and the Responsible Projection of US Force

Michael Innes perceptively illuminates a construct that shaped the last twenty years of war, with tragic implications for millions of people, but which few have ever heard of. If you want to understand how the War on Terror went so awry, read this book. -- David Kilcullen, author of The Accidental Guerrilla and The Dragons and the Snakes In the aftermath of 9/11, the US military and CIA launched an unprecedented, 20 year sanctuary denial campaign that saw hundreds of thousands of troops and operatives deployed across the globe. But, even as CIA drone fleets wiped out Al Qaeda and Special Forces hunted ISIS insurgents in the ungoverned spaces, it became apparent that the Pentagon had not begun to truly understand the underlying basis for America's entire war and counter-terrorism effort; the concept of sanctuary. It is with the aim of chronicling, for the first time, the fundamental notion of sanctuary in America's wars that Innes takes readers on a truly ground-breaking and riveting journey into the history of this concept that launched the superpower's longest conflict. This story begins unexpectedly in the jungles of Vietnam in the 1960s and extends all the way to the hallways of power in Trump's Washington D.C.-- Brian Glyn Williams, Author of Counter Jihad and former CIA Counter-Terrorism Center analyst A timely, policy-relevant work that performs a tremendous service by arguing that rhetoric matters when it comes to war. In a series of insightful case studies, Innes perceptively examines how policymakers and military leaders define terrorist sanctuaries and safe havens, often in ways that undermine their own national security objectives.-- Gregory A. Daddis, USS Midway Chair in Modern U.S. Military History, San Diego State University Soldier-scholar Michael Innes' Streets Without Joy is an especially timely and important contribution to the literature. His first-hand experience coupled with his grasp and analysis of the historical salience of this issue as well as its relevance to contemporary conflicts, is as original as it is insightful.-- Professor Bruce Hoffman, Georgetown University and author of Inside Terrorism Despite their critical importance in armed conflicts, wartime sanctuaries rarely receive the scholarly scrutiny the topic deserves. In this highly readable book, Innes connects the dots with his fine analysis of half a century of US wartime sanctuary discourses, offering much new insight into a highly policy-relevant theme.-- Brynjar Lia, Professor of Middle East Studies, University of Oslo In Streets Without Joy, Michael Innes combines applied history and theory to explore how the dominant discourses of rebel sanctuaries and terrorist safe havens shaped the way in which the US waged war in the 9/11 era. The writing is compelling, and the author's constant attention to methodology and sense of time and place are deeply impressive. Not only is this intellectually ambitious book a fitting tribute to Bernard Fall, whose life and work inspired the author's own journey from practitioner to scholar; it is a singular achievement in its own right, one that demands the attention of every scholar of modern warfare.-- Professor Joe Maiolo, King's College London Extremely readable, lucidly stated and focused, Innes' analysis is enhanced by a sharp eye for concrete situations and an ear for the voices of people he has met up with in the course of his career. This book not only traces the history of sanctuaries since the Second World War it also offers a penetrating analysis of our own world of frontlines, back alleys and safe and not-so-safe spaces that defy sovereign jurisdiction. -- Professor Christopher Coker, London School of Economics Innes' important book explores an understudied element of American foreign policy discourse. The author illustrates that the post-9/11 rhetoric about enemy sanctuaries in Afghanistan and Iraq was far from new; instead it drew on a long history that was both deeply embedded in and had a significant impact on policymaking.-- Andrew Priest, Department of History, University of Essex Michael Innes provides an authoritative investigation into the origins, multiple meanings, use and abuse of Americas post-9/11 sanctuary discourse. Original and compelling, this book provokes numerous trains of thought that will serve to fertilise many new fields of War on Terrorism scholarship -- Dr Jeffrey Michaels, Senior Fellow, Barcelona Institute of International Studies Michael Innes' book on sanctuaries is an indispensable guide to an issue that has been central to the wars and security debates of the past generation - and will continue to be in future.-- Anatol Lieven, author of Pakistan: A Hard Country A masterful account of how streets without joy are bordered by offices where thought is locally instrumental, language elides, and truth is elsewhere. In demonstrating problems endemic to bureaucracies (including universities), Innes suggests how the US can fight so long and so aimlessly. Quite literally surreal, illuminating, and depressing.' -- David A. Westbrook, author of Getting Through Security: Counterterrorism, Bureaucracy, and a Sense of the Modern (with Mark Maguire), and Deploying Ourselves: Islamist Violence and the Responsible Projection of US Force

"""Michael Innes perceptively illuminates a construct that shaped the last twenty years of war, with tragic implications for millions of people, but which few have ever heard of. If you want to understand how the War on Terror went so awry, read this book."" -- David Kilcullen, author of The Accidental Guerrilla and The Dragons and the Snakes ""In the aftermath of 9/11, the US military and CIA launched an unprecedented, 20 year ""sanctuary denial"" campaign that saw hundreds of thousands of troops and operatives deployed across the globe. But, even as CIA drone fleets wiped out Al Qaeda and Special Forces hunted ISIS insurgents in the ""ungoverned spaces"", it became apparent that the Pentagon had not begun to truly understand the underlying basis for America's entire war and counter-terrorism effort; the concept of sanctuary. It is with the aim of chronicling, for the first time, the fundamental notion of sanctuary in America's wars that Innes takes readers on a truly ground-breaking and riveting journey into the history of this concept that launched the superpower's longest conflict. This story begins unexpectedly in the jungles of Vietnam in the 1960s and extends all the way to the hallways of power in Trump's Washington D.C.""-- Brian Glyn Williams, Author of Counter Jihad and former CIA Counter-Terrorism Center analyst ""A timely, policy-relevant work that performs a tremendous service by arguing that rhetoric matters when it comes to war. In a series of insightful case studies, Innes perceptively examines how policymakers and military leaders define ""terrorist sanctuaries"" and ""safe havens,"" often in ways that undermine their own national security objectives.""-- Gregory A. Daddis, USS Midway Chair in Modern U.S. Military History, San Diego State University ""Soldier-scholar Michael Innes' Streets Without Joy is an especially timely and important contribution to the literature. His first-hand experience coupled with his grasp and analysis of the historical salience of this issue as well as its relevance to contemporary conflicts, is as original as it is insightful.""-- Professor Bruce Hoffman, Georgetown University and author of Inside Terrorism ""Despite their critical importance in armed conflicts, wartime sanctuaries rarely receive the scholarly scrutiny the topic deserves. In this highly readable book, Innes connects the dots with his fine analysis of half a century of US wartime sanctuary discourses, offering much new insight into a highly policy-relevant theme.""-- Brynjar Lia, Professor of Middle East Studies, University of Oslo ""In Streets Without Joy, Michael Innes combines applied history and theory to explore how the dominant discourses of rebel ""sanctuaries"" and terrorist ""safe havens"" shaped the way in which the US waged war in the 9/11 era. The writing is compelling, and the author's constant attention to methodology and sense of time and place are deeply impressive. Not only is this intellectually ambitious book a fitting tribute to Bernard Fall, whose life and work inspired the author's own journey from practitioner to scholar; it is a singular achievement in its own right, one that demands the attention of every scholar of modern warfare.""-- Professor Joe Maiolo, King's College London ""Extremely readable, lucidly stated and focused, Innes' analysis is enhanced by a sharp eye for concrete situations and an ear for the voices of people he has met up with in the course of his career. This book not only traces the history of sanctuaries since the Second World War it also offers a penetrating analysis of our own world of frontlines, ""back alleys"" and ""safe"" and ""not-so-safe"" spaces that defy sovereign jurisdiction."" -- Professor Christopher Coker, London School of Economics ""Innes' important book explores an understudied element of American foreign policy discourse. The author illustrates that the post-9/11 rhetoric about enemy sanctuaries in Afghanistan and Iraq was far from new; instead it drew on a long history that was both deeply embedded in and had a significant impact on policymaking.""-- Andrew Priest, Department of History, University of Essex ""Michael Innes provides an authoritative investigation into the origins, multiple meanings, use and abuse of America´s post-9/11 sanctuary discourse. Original and compelling, this book provokes numerous trains of thought that will serve to fertilise many new fields of War on Terrorism scholarship"" -- Dr Jeffrey Michaels, Senior Fellow, Barcelona Institute of International Studies ""Michael Innes' book on sanctuaries is an indispensable guide to an issue that has been central to the wars and security debates of the past generation - and will continue to be in future.""-- Anatol Lieven, author of Pakistan: A Hard Country A masterful account of how streets without joy are bordered by offices where thought is locally instrumental, language elides, and truth is elsewhere. In demonstrating problems endemic to bureaucracies (including universities), Innes suggests how the US can fight so long and so aimlessly. Quite literally surreal, illuminating, and depressing.' -- David A. Westbrook, author of Getting Through Security: Counterterrorism, Bureaucracy, and a Sense of the Modern (with Mark Maguire), and Deploying Ourselves: Islamist Violence and the Responsible Projection of US Force"

Michael Innes perceptively illuminates a construct that shaped the last twenty years of war, with tragic implications for millions of people, but which few have ever heard of. If you want to understand how the War on Terror went so awry, read this book. -- David Kilcullen, author of The Accidental Guerrilla and The Dragons and the Snakes In the aftermath of 9/11, the US military and CIA launched an unprecedented, 20 year sanctuary denial campaign that saw hundreds of thousands of troops and operatives deployed across the globe. But, even as CIA drone fleets wiped out Al Qaeda and Special Forces hunted ISIS insurgents in the ungoverned spaces , it became apparent that the Pentagon had not begun to truly understand the underlying basis for America's entire war and counter-terrorism effort; the concept of sanctuary. It is with the aim of chronicling, for the first time, the fundamental notion of sanctuary in America's wars that Innes takes readers on a truly ground-breaking and riveting journey into the history of this concept that launched the superpower's longest conflict. This story begins unexpectedly in the jungles of Vietnam in the 1960s and extends all the way to the hallways of power in Trump's Washington D.C. -- Brian Glyn Williams, Author of Counter Jihad and former CIA Counter-Terrorism Center analyst A timely, policy-relevant work that performs a tremendous service by arguing that rhetoric matters when it comes to war. In a series of insightful case studies, Innes perceptively examines how policymakers and military leaders define terrorist sanctuaries and safe havens, often in ways that undermine their own national security objectives. -- Gregory A. Daddis, USS Midway Chair in Modern U.S. Military History, San Diego State University Soldier-scholar Michael Innes' Streets Without Joy is an especially timely and important contribution to the literature. His first-hand experience coupled with his grasp and analysis of the historical salience of this issue as well as its relevance to contemporary conflicts, is as original as it is insightful. -- Professor Bruce Hoffman, Georgetown University and author of Inside Terrorism Despite their critical importance in armed conflicts, wartime sanctuaries rarely receive the scholarly scrutiny the topic deserves. In this highly readable book, Innes connects the dots with his fine analysis of half a century of US wartime sanctuary discourses, offering much new insight into a highly policy-relevant theme. -- Brynjar Lia, Professor of Middle East Studies, University of Oslo In Streets Without Joy, Michael Innes combines applied history and theory to explore how the dominant discourses of rebel sanctuaries and terrorist safe havens shaped the way in which the US waged war in the 9/11 era. The writing is compelling, and the author's constant attention to methodology and sense of time and place are deeply impressive. Not only is this intellectually ambitious book a fitting tribute to Bernard Fall, whose life and work inspired the author's own journey from practitioner to scholar; it is a singular achievement in its own right, one that demands the attention of every scholar of modern warfare. -- Professor Joe Maiolo, King's College London Extremely readable, lucidly stated and focused, Innes' analysis is enhanced by a sharp eye for concrete situations and an ear for the voices of people he has met up with in the course of his career. This book not only traces the history of sanctuaries since the Second World War it also offers a penetrating analysis of our own world of frontlines, back alleys and safe and not-so-safe spaces that defy sovereign jurisdiction. -- Professor Christopher Coker, London School of Economics Innes' important book explores an understudied element of American foreign policy discourse. The author illustrates that the post-9/11 rhetoric about enemy sanctuaries in Afghanistan and Iraq was far from new; instead it drew on a long history that was both deeply embedded in and had a significant impact on policymaking. -- Andrew Priest, Department of History, University of Essex Michael Innes provides an authoritative investigation into the origins, multiple meanings, use and abuse of America s post-9/11 sanctuary discourse. Original and compelling, this book provokes numerous trains of thought that will serve to fertilise many new fields of War on Terrorism scholarship -- Dr Jeffrey Michaels, Senior Fellow, Barcelona Institute of International Studies Michael Innes' book on sanctuaries is an indispensable guide to an issue that has been central to the wars and security debates of the past generation - and will continue to be in future. -- Anatol Lieven, author of Pakistan: A Hard Country A masterful account of how streets without joy are bordered by offices where thought is locally instrumental, language elides, and truth is elsewhere. In demonstrating problems endemic to bureaucracies (including universities), Innes suggests how the US can fight so long and so aimlessly. Quite literally surreal, illuminating, and depressing.' -- David A. Westbrook, author of Getting Through Security: Counterterrorism, Bureaucracy, and a Sense of the Modern (with Mark Maguire), and Deploying Ourselves: Islamist Violence and the Responsible Projection of US Force

Author Information

Michael A. Innes (PhD, SOAS) is a London-based scholar and practitioner. Covering conflicts across Africa, Asia and the Middle East for twenty years, he has worked in Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, C�te d'Ivoire, Indonesia and Nigeria. In 2003--9, he was a civilian advisor with NATO in Belgium and the Balkans.

Tab Content 6

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

Countries Available