Overview

The words and actions of states have a significant influence on international law. But what of silence and inaction? During the twentieth and twenty-first century, the framework of international law underwent profound transformation. As a result, the contexts in which State silence may be interpreted have become complex and are not well understood. In light of these new realities, this ground-breaking volume explores the evolving legal meaning and effects of State silence in international law-making. Across sixteen chapters, this book questions the circumstances that necessitate a State's reaction, the factors influencing a State's ability to respond, and how a period of silence should be assessed. It also investigates whether and how the shift in international law from bilateralism towards community interests, multilateralism, intergovernmental institutions, and expert bodies, including international courts and tribunals, affect the interpretation of State silence. Furthermore, it probes whether and how advancements in communication, the increased number of States, and their diverse characteristics influence this interpretation.Examining these issues across multiple facets of international law, the book demonstrates the ubiquity of State silence and its legal significance in different fields, and the contextual factors that come together to interpret State silence in a particular instance. Through this exploration, the broad question of state silence's role in either maintaining stability or enabling change is scrutinised. Featuring contributions from twenty-one experts, State Silence Across International Law is a must read for anyone interested in understanding state silence as a factor across different areas of law, including peace and security, international humanitarian law, international criminal law, and international economic law, among others.

Full Product Details

9780198912620

Table of Contents

Reviews

Masterfully conducted and put together by Danae Azaria, this outstanding collective research on the legal meaning of State silence across various fields of international law will be much talked about. While silence is always deeply contextual, giving it legal significance—or not—ultimately rests on commonsensical considerations that betray a certain understanding of social relations. Silence is thus not only crucial for what it means, but most importantly for what allows us to make it meaningful. In other words, State silence speaks volumes about the very possibility of law in the international community. * Pierre d’Argent, University of Louvain *

Author Information

Danae Azaria Associate Professor of Law at the Faculty of Laws, University College London (UCL), and the Principal Investigator of the Starting Grant (State Silence) of the European Research Council. She is a laureate of the Guggenheim Prize in Public International Law for her monograph, Treaties on Transit of Energy via Pipelines and Countermeasures (OUP, 2015) and has published widely in international law. She holds and has held various prestigious editorial and advisory positions and visiting professorships. She is listed as an arbitrator in relation to various treaties, and she regularly advises governments and international organizations on issues of public international law.

Tab Content 6

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

Countries Available