Overview

This book addresses the worldwide movement towards granting the parties to a contract the possibility of defining the rules of evidence in a pending or future court procedure. The so-called “evidentiary contracts and agreements” are contractual stipulations to derogate default statutory norms regarding evidence. Legal systems more inclined to see judges as central characters of litigation often emphasize jurisdictional powers to produce evidence ex officio. Judges should be entitled to bring evidence to the procedure on their own motion to search for the truth; justice and fairness of the final decisions about the facts should be assured as values of public interest, intrinsically dependent on judicial oversight. Therefore, parties should not be able to govern those rules according to their private goals and strategies. In other legal systems, parties have a stronger role as protagonists of the procedure and should take the more intense initiatives regarding the allegation of facts and the evidence supporting them. Party autonomy to shape the formalities of litigation should follow the waivability of substantive legal rights. Judges would then have a subsidiary role, and parties’ stipulations about evidence would reflect the unavoidable private interests involved, including the costs of evidence and its impacts on privacy, professional or trade secrets, and business confidential information. Across the globe, many contracts nowadays (both nationally and internationally) contain clauses through which the parties intend to control and regulate how evidence is to be taken, evaluated, and how it should or should not support the legal reasoning about facts in judicial decisions. In this backdrop, a comparative analysis of different jurisdictions can certainly be of interest to academics and practitioners. It seems of utmost relevance to debate the admissibility of evidentiary contracts and agreements, their conditions of validity, the role of judges vis-à-vis these stipulations, and the several types of legal transactions that can be entered into by the parties to determine the rules of evidence to be applied in a certain court procedure.

Full Product Details

9783032225597

Table of Contents

Reviews

Author Information

Prof. Dr. Antonio Cabral has his Habilitation at the University of São Paulo, a Ph.D. at the University of Rio de Janeiro in cooperation with the University of Munich, Germany (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität), a Master of Laws at the University of Rio de Janeiro, and post-doctorate studies at the University of Paris 1 (Panthéon-Sorbonne). He is currently Vice-President of the International Association of Procedural Law and Co-Director of the Center for German and Comparative Law Studies at the University of Rio de Janeiro. He is a Professor of Law at the University of Rio de Janeiro, and has been a Visiting Professor at the Universities of Passau and Kiel (Germany), Ritsumeikan University (Kyoto, Japan), and Pontificia Universidad Catolica (Lima, Peru), as well as a Senior Lecturer at Peking University (China). He is the Co-Editor of the books “Contractualisation of Civil Litigation” (Intersentia, 2023) and “Shaping Civil Litigation Using Procedural Agreements” (Eleven, 2024), among many other books and articles on the subject.

Tab Content 6

Countries Available