Free Delivery Over $100
|
|
|||
|
||||
OverviewFull Product DetailsAuthor: Despoina Mantzari (Associate Professor in Competition Law and Policy, Associate Professor in Competition Law and Policy, UCL Faculty of Laws)Publisher: Oxford University Press Imprint: Oxford University Press Edition: 1 Dimensions: Width: 16.20cm , Height: 2.00cm , Length: 24.00cm Weight: 0.540kg ISBN: 9780198851608ISBN 10: 019885160 Pages: 272 Publication Date: 16 September 2022 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Manufactured on demand  We will order this item for you from a manufactured on demand supplier. Table of Contents1: Introduction 2: Unpacking Economic Evidence 3: Imperfect Alternatives: Actors and Processes for the Review of Economic Evidence in the US and the UK 4: Transforming Discretion 5: From 'Hard Look Review' to 'Thin Rationality' review: The US Courts' Response to Economic Evidence 6: The Institutional Response: Judicial Scrutiny of Economic Evidence at the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal 7: Towards a Complementary Relationship between the Court and the Regulatory Agency in the Realm of Utility Regulation 8: EpilogueReviewsThis work offers a new and highly effective approach to the study of regulatory practice, particularly by different institutional models, on the use and critical examination of economic evidence. In favouring the methods and practices of the UK's Competition Appeal Tribunal, (the 'CAT') it makes a judgment with which it is very hard to disagree. But the book is valuable as much for the comprehensive coverage of two decades' practice as for the conclusions it reaches. The author is to be congratulated for this timely contribution to the study of regulation. * Peter Freeman CBE, KC (Hon), CAT Chairman 2013-2021 * This book sheds much needed light on how courts engage - or should engage - with economic evidence in regulatory disputes and is a must-read for anyone interested in judicial review and economic evidence in the realm of regulation and beyond. The author's analysis is theoretically solid, methodologically rich and rigorous, and exceptionally insightful and thought-provoking * Dr Andriani Kalintiri, Dickson Poon School of Law, King's College London * This book sheds much needed light on how courts engage - or should engage - with economic evidence in regulatory disputes and is a must-read for anyone interested in judicial review and economic evidence in the realm of regulation and beyond. The author's analysis is theoretically solid, methodologically rich and rigorous, and exceptionally insightful and thought-provoking * Dr Andriani Kalintiri, Dickson Poon School of Law, King's College London * Author InformationDr Despoina Mantzari is Associate Professor in Competition Law and Policy at University College London (UCL), Faculty of Laws. Prior to that she was a lecturer at the University of Reading and a postdoctoral research fellow at the Centre for Competition Policy at the University of East Anglia. She was also a visiting researcher at the UC Berkeley Boalt Hall School of Law and a Fellow at the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies in London. She holds a PhD and an LL.M from UCL and studied law at the National University of Athens. Her research cuts across competition law and public law and regulation and has been funded by the AHRC, the ESRC, and the BA/Leverhulme Trust. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |
||||
