|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewThe concept of identity has been seen to lead to paradox: we cannot truly and usefully say that a thing is the same either as itself or as something else. This book is a full examination of this paradox in philosophical logic, and of its implications for the philosophy of mathematics, the philosphy of mind, and relativism about identity. The author's account involves detailed discussion of the views of Wittgenstein, Russell, Frege, and Hintikka. Full Product DetailsAuthor: C. J. F. Williams (Professor of Philosophy, Professor of Philosophy, University of Bristol)Publisher: Oxford University Press Imprint: Clarendon Press Dimensions: Width: 14.40cm , Height: 1.90cm , Length: 22.30cm Weight: 0.415kg ISBN: 9780198248088ISBN 10: 0198248083 Pages: 232 Publication Date: 07 December 1989 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: To order ![]() Stock availability from the supplier is unknown. We will order it for you and ship this item to you once it is received by us. Table of ContentsThe paradox of identity: Plato to Russell; Wittgenstein: Identity not a relation; The need for a sign of identity; Same and self; An Eirenic interlude; Identity and indiscernibility; Arithmetical equations; The identity of events; Personal identity; Being, identity and truthReviews<br> This book is clearly written by an author who is both technically and historically adept: the result is a first-rate treatment of a deep, difficult philosophical issue. --Choice<br> There is a wealth of material here for the logician concerned with the choice of a symbolism but also for the philosopher who is interested in the constitution of the self, in scientific statements of identity, or in the nature of mathematical knowledge. Williams is exact and careful in his demonstrations of what a given notation can and cannot do, and his criticisms of influential positions, though brief and schematic, are direct and provocative. The Review of Metaphysics<br> This book is clearly written by an author who is both technically and historically adept: the result is a first-rate treatment of a deep, difficult philosophical issue. --Choice<br> There is a wealth of material here for the logician concerned with the choice of a symbolism but also for the philosopher who is interested in the constitution of the self, in scientific statements of identity, or in the nature of mathematical knowledge. Williams is exact and careful in his demonstrations of what a given notation can and cannot do, and his criticisms of influential positions, though brief and schematic, are direct and provocative. The Review of Metaphysics<br> Author InformationTab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |