|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewJust War has attracted considerable attention. The words peace and justice are often used together. Surprisingly, however, little conceptual thinking has gone into what constitutes a Just Peace. This book, which includes some of the world's leading scholars, debates and develops the concept of Just Peace. The problem with the idea of a Just Peace is that striving for justice may imply a Just War. In other words, peace and justice clash at times. Therefore, one often starts from a given view of what constitutes justice, but this a priori approach leads - especially when imposed from the outside - straight into discord. This book presents conflicting viewpoints on this question from political, historical, and legal perspectives as well as from a policy perspective. The book also argues that Just Peace should be defined as a process resting on four necessary and sufficient conditions: thin recognition whereby the other is accepted as autonomous; thick recognition whereby identities need to be accounted for; renouncement, requiring significant sacrifices from all parties; and finally, rule, the objectification of a Just Peace by a ""text"" requiring a common language respecting the identities of each, and defining their rights and duties. This approach based on a language-oriented process amongst directly concerned parties, goes beyond liberal and culturalist perspectives. Throughout the process, negotiators need to build a novel shared reality as well as a new common language allowing for an enduring harmony between previously clashing peoples. It challenges a liberal view of peace founded on norms claiming universal scope. The liberal conception has difficulty in solving conflicts such as civil wars characterized typically by fundamental disagreements between different communities. Cultures make demands that are identity-defining, and some of these defy the ""cultural neutrality"" that is one of the foundations of liberalism. Therefore, the concept of Just Peace cannot be solved within the liberal tradition. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Pierre Allan (Dean of Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences and Professor of International Relations, University of Geneva) , Alexis Keller (Professor of History of Legal and Political Thought)Publisher: Oxford University Press Imprint: Oxford University Press Dimensions: Width: 6.50cm , Height: 2.00cm , Length: 24.10cm Weight: 0.534kg ISBN: 9780199275359ISBN 10: 0199275351 Pages: 244 Publication Date: 26 January 2006 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: To order ![]() Stock availability from the supplier is unknown. We will order it for you and ship this item to you once it is received by us. Table of Contents1: Pierre Allan and Alexis Keller: Introduction: Rethinking Peace and Justice Conceptually 2: Stanley Hoffmann: Peace and Justice: A Prologue 3: Alexis Keller: Justice, Peace, and History: A Reappraisal 4: Adam Roberts: Just Peace: A Cause Worth Fighting For? 5: Pierre Allan: Measuring International Ethics: A Moral Scale of War, Peace, Justice, and Global Care 6: Yossi Beilin: Just Peace: A Dangerous Objective 7: David Little: Peace, Justice, and Religion 8: Edward Said: A Method for Thinking About Just Peace 9: Pierre Allan and Alexis Keller: The Concept of a Just Peace, or Achieving Peace Through Recognition, Renouncement, and Rule 10: Suggested ReadingsReviewsAuthor InformationTab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |