Overview

Margaret Otlowski tackles the complex and controversial issue of active voluntary euthanasia and argues convincingly for a reform of the criminal law prohibition in common law jurisdictions. Otlowski critically examines the strict legal situation on euthanasia, which treats medically assisted dying as murder, and contrasts it with the position in practice. By highlighting the leniency shown to the few doctors who have actually been prosecuted for assisting their patients to die, she points to the discrepancy between the law and medical practice and argues for reform. The many arguments raised in the euthanasia debate are considered, as are steps taken towards reform in the UK, USA, Canada, and the Netherlands (where active euthanasia in now openly practised).

Full Product Details

9780198298687

Table of Contents

Reviews

Otlowski's command and manipulation of her sources, from the common law to the moral plane, across the deserts of causation and intention, and through the swamps of public policy, are a delight to read ... Otlowski's clear and consistent argument is that non-legalized, active voluntary euthanasia does more harm than would its legalized cousin. Her style is elegant, yet thoughtful and judicious. This book is a remarkable achievement; an invaluable contribution to an old debate where too frequently fiction takes the place of fact, where fable does the work of narrative, and where demons and panics abound and the stylistically straightforward is surrendered to the sesquipedalian. Into such a fabulous world the refreshing breeze of measured argument and analysis is always a welcome visitor, whether you like the nature of their calling card or not. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 22 (1) 2000

`Otlowski's command and manipulation of her sources, from the common law to the moral plane, across the deserts of causation and intention, and through the swamps of public policy, are a delight to read ... Otlowski's clear and consistent argument is that non-legalized, active voluntary euthanasia does more harm than would its legalized cousin. Her style is elegant, yet thoughtful and judicious. This book is a remarkable achievement; an invaluable contribution to an old debate where too frequently fiction takes the place of fact, where fable does the work of narrative, and where demons and panics abound and the stylistically straightforward is surrendered to the sesquipedalian. Into such a fabulous world the refreshing breeze of measured argument and analysis is always a welcome visitor, whether you like the nature of their calling card or not.' Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 22 (1) 2000

Otlowski's command and manipulation of her sources, from the common law to the moral plane, across the deserts of causation and intention, and through the swamps of public policy, are a delight to read ... Otlowski's clear and consistent argument is that non-legalized, active voluntary euthanasia does more harm than would its legalized cousin. Her style is elegant, yet thoughtful and judicious. This book is a remarkable achievement; an invaluable contribution to an old debate where too frequently fiction takes the place of fact, where fable does the work of narrative, and where demons and panics abound and the stylistically straightforward is surrendered to the sesquipedalian. Into such a fabulous world the refreshing breeze of measured argument and analysis is always a welcome visitor, whether you like the nature of their calling card or not. * Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 22 (1) 2000 *

Author Information

Dr Margaret Otlowski is Associate Professor in the Faculty of Commerce and Law, University of Tasmania. She has acted as a consultant for various government working parties on issues relating to the ethics of health care. She has filled the position of Chair for the Tasmania Ethics Committee (Human Experimentation) since 1993.

Tab Content 6

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

Countries Available