Overview

Full Product Details

9781138273023

Table of Contents

Reviews

Effectively puts MacIntyre and Hauerwas in the doghouse of failed logicians. Smith argues brilliantly that theological ethicists who contend that all theological ethical arguments are specific to particular language groups, cannot at the same time recommend one such set of arguments as universally normative without contradicting themselves. John (""Jack"") Crossley, Chair of University of Southern California's School of Religion, USA. ""Scott Smith's book is a penetrating examination and critique of the major line of thought against the possibility of moral knowledge that has dominated discussions in moral theory for the last fifty years. He carefully illuminates the flaws in this line of thought and opens the door to a possible renewal of moral understanding for today"". Dallas Willard, Professor of Philosophy, University of Southern California, USA

Effectively puts MacIntyre and Hauerwas in the doghouse of failed logicians. Smith argues brilliantly that theological ethicists who contend that all theological ethical arguments are specific to particular language groups, cannot at the same time recommend one such set of arguments as universally normative without contradicting themselves. John ( Jack ) Crossley, Chair of University of Southern California's School of Religion, USA. Scott Smith's book is a penetrating examination and critique of the major line of thought against the possibility of moral knowledge that has dominated discussions in moral theory for the last fifty years. He carefully illuminates the flaws in this line of thought and opens the door to a possible renewal of moral understanding for today . Dallas Willard, Professor of Philosophy, University of Southern California, USA

Author Information

R. Scott Smith

Tab Content 6

Countries Available