Overview

In Unwritten Verities: The Making of England's Vernacular Legal Culture, 1463-1549, Sebastian Sobecki argues that the commitment by English common law to an unwritten tradition, along with its association with Lancastrian political ideas of consensual government, generated a vernacular legal culture on the eve of the Reformation that challenged the centralizing ambitions of Tudor monarchs, the scriptural literalism of ardent Protestants, and the Latinity of English humanists. Sobecki identifies the widespread dissemination of legal books and William Caxton's printing of the Statutes of Henry VII as crucial events in the creation of a vernacular legal culture. He reveals the impact of medieval concepts of language, governance, and unwritten authority on such sixteenth-century humanists, reformers, playwrights, and legal writers as John Rastell, Thomas Elyot, Christopher St. German, Edmund Dudley, John Heywood, and Thomas Starkey. Unwritten Verities argues that three significant developments contributed to the emergence of a vernacular legal culture in fifteenth-century England: medieval literary theories of translation, a Lancastrian legacy of conciliar government, and an adherence to unwritten tradition. This vernacular legal culture, in turn, challenged the textual practices of English humanism and the early Reformation in the following century. Ultimately, the spread of vernacular law books found a response in the popular rebellions of 1549, at the helm of which often stood petitioners trained in legal writing. Informed by new developments in medieval literature and early modern social history, Unwritten Verities sheds new light on law printing, John Fortescue's constitutional thought, ideas of the commonwealth, and the role of French in medieval and Tudor England.

Full Product Details

Author:   Sebastian Sobecki
Publisher:   University of Notre Dame Press
Imprint:   University of Notre Dame Press
Dimensions:   Width: 15.20cm , Height: 1.50cm , Length: 22.90cm
Weight:   0.393kg
ISBN:  

9780268041458

ISBN 10:   0268041458
Pages:   268
Publication Date:   15 March 2015
Audience:   College/higher education ,  Undergraduate ,  Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly
Format:   Paperback
Publisher's Status:   Active
Availability:   In Print  
This item will be ordered in for you from one of our suppliers. Upon receipt, we will promptly dispatch it out to you. For in store availability, please contact us.

Table of Contents

Reviews

Sebastian Sobecki's lucid and lively study seeks to address a major lacuna in the current understanding of English vernacularity from the fourteenth to the sixteenth centuries: English common law. This huge body of knowledge and practice, written and unwritten, awaits focused attention from historians and literary historians, particularly in the light of new scholarship on Anglo-French vernacularity in this period. Sobecki's ambitious, original, and deeply considered account includes such figures as John Fortescue, John Rastell, and Christopher St. German and their investments in and influence on early Tudor commonality. The range and intelligence of his approach to this material, his ability to think beyond period and disciplinary boundaries, and his alertness to the complex bilingual condition of English intellectuals add a compelling dimension to the debate on the linguistic and political shapes of insular identity in these centuries. --Ardis Butterfield, John M. Schiff Professor of English, Yale University In his accessible and carefully researched book, Sobecki repositions Fortescue, St. German, and Rastell as thinkers concerned as much with the relationship between the English language and the common law as with England's constitutional arrangements. The result is an argument that is simultaneously controversial, thought-provoking, and wide-ranging in its implications. --Sixteenth Century Journal Sobecki convincingly argues his central thesis that a unique common law vernacular legal culture was present in England in this period, which was not limited to the works of John Fortescue, St German, and John Rastell. Sobecki's treatment of English law presents a compelling invitation for future scholarship on the influence of the ius commune on England's vernacular legal tradition, particularly in the works of Fortescue. --Parergon Unwritten Verities is an eloquently written work. In it, Sobecki's absorbing arguments as to the significance and impact of the developments in English legal vernacularity are presented eruditely. . . . Due to the varied nature of the source material selected for analysis and the arguments proffered, Sobecki's overarching discussion will be of undoubted value to those with interests as varied as medieval literature, early modern studies, constitutional law, social history and legal history in general. --Journal of Legal History In this book, [Sobecki] delivers the sum of a wide range of parts and convey the importance of those pieces to a community of scholars accustomed to looking past them. Chapter after chapter features fresh, robust claims that shed light on authors rarely considered by critics and are sure to shape the direction of future scholarship. --The Medieval Review Unwritten Verities proposes an arresting and original thesis: that the English common law's commitment to an oral tradition permitted it, on the eve of the Reformation, to become a transformative repository for notions of consensual government, of the inwardness of spiritual jurisdiction, and of the preeminence of English. This elegantly written and engagingly controversial book will stimulate literary scholars, legal historians, and historians of political thought to look afresh at some of their fundamental assumptions about English literature, politics, and the law at the turn of the fifteenth century. --Lorna Hutson, Berry Professor of English Literature, University of St. Andrews In Unwritten Verities, Sebastian Sobecki provides an engaging, interdisciplinary study of English Common law's oral tradition. Emerging from this volume is a provocative consideration of the relationship between common law and Anglo-French vernacularity in late mediaeval and early modern England. Importantly, Sobecki's examination of vernacular legal culture challenges late medieval periodization, connecting the writing of John Fortescue and other English legal thinkers to subsequent ideas about consensual and even socially inclusive government. --Renaissance and Reformation As readers of Sobecki's earlier works already know, he is a very clever writer: both his general arguments and his asides are full of rich ideas. His literary analysis . . . is always clear and convincing. Indeed, it is an achievement to have written a book about literature that legal historians would find useful. . . The book [has] enduring value as a sharp explication of the textual and ideological complexities at work in the late-medieval and early modern common law. --Speculum Unwritten Verities boasts persuasive and original arguments that genuinely reframe the ways we understand English humanism, the history of print, and vernacular culture. . . . [The book] will surely become an indispensable text for anyone working on English law and vernacularity. --H-Law, H-Net Reviews Sebastian Sobecki makes the argument that English common law became the repository of consensual theories of government in the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries. Unwritten Verities challenges the view of common law as insular even though in the early seventeenth century it later became the conduit for the idea of English particularity. --Studies in English Literature Unwritten Verities learnedly tells us all about common law and Lancastrian principles and all the legal thought and procedure based on traditions but of course adapted in The Renaissance to post-medieval circumstances as conciliar rule struggled with Tudor domination... This study is careful but quite revolutionary. It can and should readjust scholarly ideas and point to new directions in research not only in common law but common language and literature. --Bibliotheque d'Humanisme et Renaissance

"""Sebastian Sobecki’s lucid and lively study seeks to address a major lacuna in the current understanding of English vernacularity from the fourteenth to the sixteenth centuries: English common law. This huge body of knowledge and practice, written and unwritten, awaits focused attention from historians and literary historians, particularly in the light of new scholarship on Anglo-French vernacularity in this period. Sobecki’s ambitious, original, and deeply considered account includes such figures as John Fortescue, John Rastell, and Christopher St. German and their investments in and influence on early Tudor commonality. The range and intelligence of his approach to this material, his ability to think beyond period and disciplinary boundaries, and his alertness to the complex bilingual condition of English intellectuals add a compelling dimension to the debate on the linguistic and political shapes of insular identity in these centuries."" —Ardis Butterfield, John M. Schiff Professor of English, Yale University ""Unwritten Verities proposes an arresting and original thesis: that the English common law’s commitment to an oral tradition permitted it, on the eve of the Reformation, to become a transformative repository for notions of consensual government, of the inwardness of spiritual jurisdiction, and of the preeminence of English. This elegantly written and engagingly controversial book will stimulate literary scholars, legal historians, and historians of political thought to look afresh at some of their fundamental assumptions about English literature, politics, and the law at the turn of the fifteenth century."" —Lorna Hutson, Berry Professor of English Literature, University of St. Andrews ""Unwritten Verities boasts persuasive and original arguments that genuinely reframe the ways we understand English humanism, the history of print, and vernacular culture. . . . [The book] will surely become an indispensable text for anyone working on English law and vernacularity."" —H-Law, H-Net Reviews “In this book, [Sobecki] delivers the sum of a wide range of parts and convey the importance of those pieces to a community of scholars accustomed to looking past them. Chapter after chapter features fresh, robust claims that shed light on authors rarely considered by critics and are sure to shape the direction of future scholarship.” —The Medieval Review ""In his accessible and carefully researched book, Sobecki repositions Fortescue, St. German, and Rastell as thinkers concerned as much with the relationship between the English language and the common law as with England’s constitutional arrangements. The result is an argument that is simultaneously controversial, thought-provoking, and wide-ranging in its implications."" —Sixteenth Century Journal ""Unwritten Verities is an eloquently written work. In it, Sobecki’s absorbing arguments as to the significance and impact of the developments in English legal vernacularity are presented eruditely. . . . Due to the varied nature of the source material selected for analysis and the arguments proffered, Sobecki’s overarching discussion will be of undoubted value to those with interests as varied as medieval literature, early modern studies, constitutional law, social history and legal history in general."" —Journal of Legal History “As readers of Sobecki’s earlier works already know, he is a very clever writer: both his general arguments and his asides are full of rich ideas. His literary analysis . . . is always clear and convincing. Indeed, it is an achievement to have written a book about literature that legal historians would find useful. . . The book [has] enduring value as a sharp explication of the textual and ideological complexities at work in the late-medieval and early modern common law.” —Speculum “Sebastian Sobecki makes the argument that English common law became the repository of consensual theories of government in the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries. Unwritten Verities challenges the view of common law as insular even though in the early seventeenth century it later became the conduit for the idea of English particularity.” —Studies in English Literature “Pointing to the thousands of men in the mid-sixteenth century England—from attorneys and clerks to scriveners and lay readers of legal publications—who would be engaged with vernacular legal culture on a regular basis, Sobecki makes a compelling case for the development by the mid-sixteenth century of a vibrant vernacular legal culture in England. . . . Socbecki rightly questions assumptions that this period saw a turning away from the medieval and toward the modern. If Unwritten Verities is controversial, it is so not least because it challenges its readers to recognize the enduring if unacknowledged influence of medieval ideas about language, law, and the nature of political society.” —Sixteenth Century Journal “In Unwritten Verities, Sebastian Sobecki provides an engaging, interdisciplinary study of English Common law’s oral tradition. Emerging from this volume is a provocative consideration of the relationship between common law and Anglo-French vernacularity in late mediaeval and early modern England. Importantly, Sobecki’s examination of vernacular legal culture challenges late medieval periodization, connecting the writing of John Fortescue and other English legal thinkers to subsequent ideas about consensual and even socially inclusive government.” —Renaissance and Reformation"

Sebastian Sobecki's lucid and lively study seeks to address a major lacuna in the current understanding of English vernacularity from the fourteenth to the sixteenth centuries: English common law. This huge body of knowledge and practice, written and unwritten, awaits focused attention from historians and literary historians, particularly in the light of new scholarship on Anglo-French vernacularity in this period. Sobecki's ambitious, original, and deeply considered account includes such figures as John Fortescue, John Rastell, and Christopher St. German and their investments in and influence on early Tudor commonality. The range and intelligence of his approach to this material, his ability to think beyond period and disciplinary boundaries, and his alertness to the complex bilingual condition of English intellectuals add a compelling dimension to the debate on the linguistic and political shapes of insular identity in these centuries. -Ardis Butterfield, John M. Schiff Professor of English, Yale University Unwritten Verities proposes an arresting and original thesis: that the English common law's commitment to an oral tradition permitted it, on the eve of the Reformation, to become a transformative repository for notions of consensual government, of the inwardness of spiritual jurisdiction, and of the preeminence of English. This elegantly written and engagingly controversial book will stimulate literary scholars, legal historians, and historians of political thought to look afresh at some of their fundamental assumptions about English literature, politics, and the law at the turn of the fifteenth century. -Lorna Hutson, Berry Professor of English Literature, University of St. Andrews Unwritten Verities boasts persuasive and original arguments that genuinely reframe the ways we understand English humanism, the history of print, and vernacular culture. . . . [The book] will surely become an indispensable text for anyone working on English law and vernacularity. -H-Law, H-Net Reviews In this book, [Sobecki] delivers the sum of a wide range of parts and convey the importance of those pieces to a community of scholars accustomed to looking past them. Chapter after chapter features fresh, robust claims that shed light on authors rarely considered by critics and are sure to shape the direction of future scholarship. -The Medieval Review In his accessible and carefully researched book, Sobecki repositions Fortescue, St. German, and Rastell as thinkers concerned as much with the relationship between the English language and the common law as with England's constitutional arrangements. The result is an argument that is simultaneously controversial, thought-provoking, and wide-ranging in its implications. -Sixteenth Century Journal Unwritten Verities is an eloquently written work. In it, Sobecki's absorbing arguments as to the significance and impact of the developments in English legal vernacularity are presented eruditely. . . . Due to the varied nature of the source material selected for analysis and the arguments proffered, Sobecki's overarching discussion will be of undoubted value to those with interests as varied as medieval literature, early modern studies, constitutional law, social history and legal history in general. -Journal of Legal History As readers of Sobecki's earlier works already know, he is a very clever writer: both his general arguments and his asides are full of rich ideas. His literary analysis . . . is always clear and convincing. Indeed, it is an achievement to have written a book about literature that legal historians would find useful. . . The book [has] enduring value as a sharp explication of the textual and ideological complexities at work in the late-medieval and early modern common law. -Speculum Sebastian Sobecki makes the argument that English common law became the repository of consensual theories of government in the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries. Unwritten Verities challenges the view of common law as insular even though in the early seventeenth century it later became the conduit for the idea of English particularity. -Studies in English Literature Pointing to the thousands of men in the mid-sixteenth century England-from attorneys and clerks to scriveners and lay readers of legal publications-who would be engaged with vernacular legal culture on a regular basis, Sobecki makes a compelling case for the development by the mid-sixteenth century of a vibrant vernacular legal culture in England. . . . Socbecki rightly questions assumptions that this period saw a turning away from the medieval and toward the modern. If Unwritten Verities is controversial, it is so not least because it challenges its readers to recognize the enduring if unacknowledged influence of medieval ideas about language, law, and the nature of political society. -Sixteenth Century Journal In Unwritten Verities, Sebastian Sobecki provides an engaging, interdisciplinary study of English Common law's oral tradition. Emerging from this volume is a provocative consideration of the relationship between common law and Anglo-French vernacularity in late mediaeval and early modern England. Importantly, Sobecki's examination of vernacular legal culture challenges late medieval periodization, connecting the writing of John Fortescue and other English legal thinkers to subsequent ideas about consensual and even socially inclusive government. -Renaissance and Reformation

Unwritten Verities is an eloquently written work. In it, Sobecki's absorbing arguments as to the significance and impact of the developments in English legal vernacularity are presented eruditely. . . . Due to the varied nature of the source material selected for analysis and the arguments proffered, Sobecki's overarching discussion will be of undoubted value to those with interests as varied as medieval literature, early modern studies, constitutional law, social history and legal history in general. --Journal of Legal History, vol. 37, issue 3, 2016 As readers of Sobecki's earlier works already know, he is a very clever writer: both his general arguments and his asides are full of rich ideas. His literary analysis . . . is always clear and convincing. Indeed, it is an achievement to have written a book about literature that legal historians would find useful. . . The book [has] enduring value as a sharp explication of the textual and ideological complexities at work in the late-medieval and early modern common law. --Speculum, vol. 91, no. 2, April 2016 In this book, [Sobecki] delivers the sum of a wide range of parts and conveys the importance of those pieces to a community of scholars accustomed to looking past them. Chapter after chapter features fresh, robust claims that shed light on authors rarely considered by critics and are sure to shape the direction of future scholarship. --The Medieval Review, February 12, 2016 Sobecki convincingly argues his central thesis that a unique common law vernacular legal culture was present in England in this period, which was not limited to the works of John Fortescue, St German, and John Rastell. Sobecki's treatment of English law presents a compelling invitation for future scholarship on the influence of the ius commune on England's vernacular legal tradition, particularly in the works of Fortescue. --Parergon, vol. 32, no. 2, 2015 Sebastian Sobecki makes the argument that English common law became the repository of consensual theories of government in the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries. Unwritten Verities challenges the view of common law as insular even though in the early seventeenth century it later became the conduit for the idea of English particularity. --Studies in English Literature, Vol. 56, No. 1, Winter 2016 Unwritten Verities learnedly tells us all about common law and Lancastrian principles and all the legal thought and procedure based on traditions but of course adapted in The Renaissance to post-medieval circumstances as conciliar rule struggled with Tudor domination. . . . This study is careful but quite revolutionary. It can and should readjust scholarly ideas and point to new directions in research not only in common law but common language and literature. --Bibliotheque d'Humanisme et Renaissance, Vol. LXXXVIII (2016 #1) Pointing to the thousands of men in the mid-sixteenth century England--from attorneys and clerks to scriveners and lay readers of legal publications--who would be engaged with vernacular legal culture on a regular basis, Sobecki makes a compelling case for the development by the mid-sixteenth century of a vibrant vernacular legal culture in England. . . . Socbecki rightly questions assumptions that this period saw a turning away from the medieval and toward the modern. If Unwritten Verities is controversial, it is so not least because it challenges its readers to recognize the enduring if unacknowledged influence of medieval ideas about language, law, and the nature of political society. --Sixteenth Century Journal, 47/2, 2016 In Unwritten Verities, Sebastian Sobecki provides an engaging, interdisciplinary study of English Common law's oral tradition. Emerging from this volume is a provocative consideration of the relationship between common law and Anglo-French vernacularity in late mediaeval and early modern England. Importantly, Sobecki's examination of vernacular legal culture challenges late medieval periodization, connecting the writing of John Fortescue and other English legal thinkers to subsequent ideas about consensual and even socially inclusive government. --Renaissance and Reformation, Vol. 31, No. 1, Winter 2016

Sebastian Sobecki's lucid and lively study seeks to address a major lacuna in the current understanding of English vernacularity from the fourteenth to the sixteenth centuries: English common law. This huge body of knowledge and practice, written and unwritten, awaits focused attention from historians and literary historians, particularly in the light of new scholarship on Anglo-French vernacularity in this period. Sobecki's ambitious, original, and deeply considered account includes such figures as John Fortescue, John Rastell, and Christopher St. German and their investments in and influence on early Tudor commonality. The range and intelligence of his approach to this material, his ability to think beyond period and disciplinary boundaries, and his alertness to the complex bilingual condition of English intellectuals add a compelling dimension to the debate on the linguistic and political shapes of insular identity in these centuries. --Ardis Butterfield, John M. Schiff Professor of English, Yale University In his accessible and carefully researched book, Sobecki repositions Fortescue, St. German, and Rastell as thinkers concerned as much with the relationship between the English language and the common law as with England's constitutional arrangements. The result is an argument that is simultaneously controversial, thought-provoking, and wide-ranging in its implications. --Sixteenth Century Journal Sebastian Sobecki makes the argument that English common law became the repository of consensual theories of government in the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries. Unwritten Verities challenges the view of common law as insular even though in the early seventeenth century it later became the conduit for the idea of English particularity. --Studies in English Literature Sobecki convincingly argues his central thesis that a unique common law vernacular legal culture was present in England in this period, which was not limited to the works of John Fortescue, St German, and John Rastell. Sobecki's treatment of English law presents a compelling invitation for future scholarship on the influence of the ius commune on England's vernacular legal tradition, particularly in the works of Fortescue. --Parergon Unwritten Verities is an eloquently written work. In it, Sobecki's absorbing arguments as to the significance and impact of the developments in English legal vernacularity are presented eruditely. . . . Due to the varied nature of the source material selected for analysis and the arguments proffered, Sobecki's overarching discussion will be of undoubted value to those with interests as varied as medieval literature, early modern studies, constitutional law, social history and legal history in general. --Journal of Legal History In this book, [Sobecki] delivers the sum of a wide range of parts and convey the importance of those pieces to a community of scholars accustomed to looking past them. Chapter after chapter features fresh, robust claims that shed light on authors rarely considered by critics and are sure to shape the direction of future scholarship. --The Medieval Review Unwritten Verities learnedly tells us all about common law and Lancastrian principles and all the legal thought and procedure based on traditions but of course adapted in The Renaissance to post-medieval circumstances as conciliar rule struggled with Tudor domination... This study is careful but quite revolutionary. It can and should readjust scholarly ideas and point to new directions in research not only in common law but common language and literature. --Bibliotheque d'Humanisme et Renaissance Unwritten Verities proposes an arresting and original thesis: that the English common law's commitment to an oral tradition permitted it, on the eve of the Reformation, to become a transformative repository for notions of consensual government, of the inwardness of spiritual jurisdiction, and of the preeminence of English. This elegantly written and engagingly controversial book will stimulate literary scholars, legal historians, and historians of political thought to look afresh at some of their fundamental assumptions about English literature, politics, and the law at the turn of the fifteenth century. --Lorna Hutson, Berry Professor of English Literature, University of St. Andrews In Unwritten Verities, Sebastian Sobecki provides an engaging, interdisciplinary study of English Common law's oral tradition. Emerging from this volume is a provocative consideration of the relationship between common law and Anglo-French vernacularity in late mediaeval and early modern England. Importantly, Sobecki's examination of vernacular legal culture challenges late medieval periodization, connecting the writing of John Fortescue and other English legal thinkers to subsequent ideas about consensual and even socially inclusive government. --Renaissance and Reformation As readers of Sobecki's earlier works already know, he is a very clever writer: both his general arguments and his asides are full of rich ideas. His literary analysis . . . is always clear and convincing. Indeed, it is an achievement to have written a book about literature that legal historians would find useful. . . The book [has] enduring value as a sharp explication of the textual and ideological complexities at work in the late-medieval and early modern common law. --Speculum Unwritten Verities boasts persuasive and original arguments that genuinely reframe the ways we understand English humanism, the history of print, and vernacular culture. . . . [The book] will surely become an indispensable text for anyone working on English law and vernacularity. --H-Law, H-Net Reviews

Unwritten Verities is an eloquently written work. In it, Sobecki's absorbing arguments as to the significance and impact of the developments in English legal vernacularity are presented eruditely. . . . Due to the varied nature of the source material selected for analysis and the arguments proffered, Sobecki's overarching discussion will be of undoubted value to those with interests as varied as medieval literature, early modern studies, constitutional law, social history and legal history in general. --Journal of Legal History As readers of Sobecki's earlier works already know, he is a very clever writer: both his general arguments and his asides are full of rich ideas. His literary analysis . . . is always clear and convincing. Indeed, it is an achievement to have written a book about literature that legal historians would find useful. . . The book [has] enduring value as a sharp explication of the textual and ideological complexities at work in the late-medieval and early modern common law. --Speculum In this book, [Sobecki] delivers the sum of a wide range of parts and conveys the importance of those pieces to a community of scholars accustomed to looking past them. Chapter after chapter features fresh, robust claims that shed light on authors rarely considered by critics and are sure to shape the direction of future scholarship. --The Medieval Review Sobecki convincingly argues his central thesis that a unique common law vernacular legal culture was present in England in this period, which was not limited to the works of John Fortescue, St German, and John Rastell. Sobecki's treatment of English law presents a compelling invitation for future scholarship on the influence of the ius commune on England's vernacular legal tradition, particularly in the works of Fortescue. --Parergon Sebastian Sobecki makes the argument that English common law became the repository of consensual theories of government in the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries. Unwritten Verities challenges the view of common law as insular even though in the early seventeenth century it later became the conduit for the idea of English particularity. --Studies in English Literature Unwritten Verities learnedly tells us all about common law and Lancastrian principles and all the legal thought and procedure based on traditions but of course adapted in The Renaissance to post-medieval circumstances as conciliar rule struggled with Tudor domination. . . . This study is careful but quite revolutionary. It can and should readjust scholarly ideas and point to new directions in research not only in common law but common language and literature. --Bibliotheque d'Humanisme et Renaissance Pointing to the thousands of men in the mid-sixteenth century England--from attorneys and clerks to scriveners and lay readers of legal publications--who would be engaged with vernacular legal culture on a regular basis, Sobecki makes a compelling case for the development by the mid-sixteenth century of a vibrant vernacular legal culture in England. . . . Socbecki rightly questions assumptions that this period saw a turning away from the medieval and toward the modern. If Unwritten Verities is controversial, it is so not least because it challenges its readers to recognize the enduring if unacknowledged influence of medieval ideas about language, law, and the nature of political society. --Sixteenth Century Journal In Unwritten Verities, Sebastian Sobecki provides an engaging, interdisciplinary study of English Common law's oral tradition. Emerging from this volume is a provocative consideration of the relationship between common law and Anglo-French vernacularity in late mediaeval and early modern England. Importantly, Sobecki's examination of vernacular legal culture challenges late medieval periodization, connecting the writing of John Fortescue and other English legal thinkers to subsequent ideas about consensual and even socially inclusive government. --Renaissance and Reformation In his accessible and carefully researched book, Sobecki repositions Fortescue, St. German, and Rastell as thinkers concerned as much with the relationship between the English language and the common law as with England's constitutional arrangements. The result is an argument that is simultaneously controversial, thought-provoking, and wide-ranging in its implications. --Sixteenth Century Journal Sobecki convincingly argues his central thesis that a unique common law vernacular legal culture was present in England in this period, which was not limited to the works of John Fortescue, St German, and John Rastell. Sobecki's treatment of English law presents a compelling invitation for future scholarship on the influence of the ius commune on England's vernacular legal tradition, particularly in the works of Fortescue. --Parergon In this book, [Sobecki] delivers the sum of a wide range of parts and convey the importance of those pieces to a community of scholars accustomed to looking past them. Chapter after chapter features fresh, robust claims that shed light on authors rarely considered by critics and are sure to shape the direction of future scholarship. --The Medieval Review Unwritten Verities boasts persuasive and original arguments that genuinely reframe the ways we understand English humanism, the history of print, and vernacular culture. . . . [The book] will surely become an indispensable text for anyone working on English law and vernacularity. --H-Law, H-Net Reviews Sebastian Sobecki's lucid and lively study seeks to address a major lacuna in the current understanding of English vernacularity from the fourteenth to the sixteenth centuries: English common law. This huge body of knowledge and practice, written and unwritten, awaits focused attention from historians and literary historians, particularly in the light of new scholarship on Anglo-French vernacularity in this period. Sobecki's ambitious, original, and deeply considered account includes such figures as John Fortescue, John Rastell, and Christopher St. German and their investments in and influence on early Tudor commonality. The range and intelligence of his approach to this material, his ability to think beyond period and disciplinary boundaries, and his alertness to the complex bilingual condition of English intellectuals add a compelling dimension to the debate on the linguistic and political shapes of insular identity in these centuries. --Ardis Butterfield, John M. Schiff Professor of English, Yale University Sebastian Sobecki's Unwritten Verities is a persuasive and well-researched book that makes a valuable contribution to the field. --Emily Steiner, University of Pennsylvania Unwritten Verities proposes an arresting and original thesis: that the English common law's commitment to an oral tradition permitted it, on the eve of the Reformation, to become a transformative repository for notions of consensual government, of the inwardness of spiritual jurisdiction, and of the preeminence of English. This elegantly written and engagingly controversial book will stimulate literary scholars, legal historians, and historians of political thought to look afresh at some of their fundamental assumptions about English literature, politics, and the law at the turn of the fifteenth century. --Lorna Hutson, Berry Professor of English Literature, University of St. Andrews

Author Information

Sebastian Sobecki is professor of medieval English literature and culture, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.

Tab Content 6

Author Website:  

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

No review item found!

Add your own review!

Countries Available

All regions