Overview

Full Product Details

9780415828697

Table of Contents

Reviews

'this book is a valuable reference to both novice and experienced researchers. The criticla thinking, decision making, and planning throughout the research process that the book and framework champion would certainly improve the quality of any research synthesis' - Phillip M. Reeves, Rayne A. Sperling, Wik Hung Pun and D. Jake Follmer, The Pennsylvania State University, The Journal of Educational Research 'Suri shows how different methods and approaches can usefully inform key decisions enacted at each phase of the research synthesis process. The MIRS framework offers a conceptual tool that gives some unity to otherwise apparently disparate recommendations for conducting research synthesis. Rather than prescribing what researchers and evaluators 'ought' to be doing, the goal is to support critical thinking about when, how and why to use particular approaches or a combination of approaches. A key strength of Suri's book is the judicious and balanced treatment given to alternative perspectives. The answer to the question, 'What constitutes good research synthesis?' is not to be found in the latest research synthesis technique. The reader is challenged to move beyond cookbook approaches to planning and conducting research synthesis.' Brad Astbury, Evaluation Journal of Australasia 'Across all the issues raised in this book, the emphasis continually is on quality of interpretation. Harsh Suri argues for quality relating to the search, the purpose, the interpretation and the methods, and her major contribution is the nature of coherence and logic of argument across these many claims. She aims to open discussions, to suggest new ways of thinking about literature reviewing, and to be ready for even more exciting approaches.' - Professor John Hattie, from the Foreword

'this book is a valuable reference to both novice and experienced researchers. The criticla thinking, decision making, and planning throughout the research process that the book and framework champion would certainly improve the quality of any research synthesis' - Phillip M. Reeves, Rayne A. Sperling, Wik Hung Pun and D. Jake Follmer, The Pennsylvania State University, The Journal of Educational Research 'Suri shows how different methods and approaches can usefully inform key decisions enacted at each phase of the research synthesis process. The MIRS framework offers a conceptual tool that gives some unity to otherwise apparently disparate recommendations for conducting research synthesis. Rather than prescribing what researchers and evaluators 'ought' to be doing, the goal is to support critical thinking about when, how and why to use particular approaches or a combination of approaches. A key strength of Suri's book is the judicious and balanced treatment given to alternative perspectives. The answer to the question, 'What constitutes good research synthesis?' is not to be found in the latest research synthesis technique. The reader is challenged to move beyond cookbook approaches to planning and conducting research synthesis.' Brad Astbury, Evaluation Journal of Australasia 'Across all the issues raised in this book, the emphasis continually is on quality of interpretation. Harsh Suri argues for quality relating to the search, the purpose, the interpretation and the methods, and her major contribution is the nature of coherence and logic of argument across these many claims. She aims to open discussions, to suggest new ways of thinking about literature reviewing, and to be ready for even more exciting approaches.' - Professor John Hattie, from the Foreword 'Suri shows how different methods and approaches can usefully inform key decisions enacted at each phase of the research synthesis process. The MIRS framework offers a conceptual tool that gives some unity to otherwise apparently disparate recommendations for conducting research synthesis. Rather than prescribing what researchers and evaluators 'ought' to be doing, the goal is to support critical thinking about when, how and why to use particular approaches or a combination of approaches. A key strength of Suri's book is the judicious and balanced treatment given to alternative perspectives. The answer to the question, 'What constitutes good research synthesis?' is not to be found in the latest research synthesis technique. The reader is challenged to move beyond cookbook approaches to planning and conducting research synthesis.' Brad Astbury, Evaluation Journal of Australasia

'Suri shows how different methods and approaches can usefully inform key decisions enacted at each phase of the research synthesis process. The MIRS framework offers a conceptual tool that gives some unity to otherwise apparently disparate recommendations for conducting research synthesis. Rather than prescribing what researchers and evaluators 'ought' to be doing, the goal is to support critical thinking about when, how and why to use particular approaches or a combination of approaches. A key strength of Suri's book is the judicious and balanced treatment given to alternative perspectives. The answer to the question, 'What constitutes good research synthesis?' is not to be found in the latest research synthesis technique. The reader is challenged to move beyond cookbook approaches to planning and conducting research synthesis.' Brad Astbury, Evaluation Journal of Australasia 'Across all the issues raised in this book, the emphasis continually is on quality of interpretation. Harsh Suri argues for quality relating to the search, the purpose, the interpretation and the methods, and her major contribution is the nature of coherence and logic of argument across these many claims. She aims to open discussions, to suggest new ways of thinking about literature reviewing, and to be ready for even more exciting approaches.' - Professor John Hattie, from the Foreword

'Across all the issues raised in this book, the emphasis continually is on quality of interpretation. Harsh Suri argues for quality relating to the search, the purpose, the interpretation and the methods, and her major contribution is the nature of coherence and logic of argument across these many claims. She aims to open discussions, to suggest new ways of thinking about literature reviewing, and to be ready for even more exciting approaches.' - Professor John Hattie, from the Foreword

Author Information

Harsh Suri is a Senior Lecturer at Deakin University, Australia. She leads a team of academic, technical and professional staff who support the Faculty of Business & Law in providing personalised, relevant and engaging programs by harnessing the power of digital technologies.

Tab Content 6

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

Countries Available