|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewThe ancient topic of universals was central to scholastic philosophy, which raised the question of whether universals exist as Platonic forms, as instantiated Aristotelian forms, as concepts abstracted from singular things, or as words that have universal signification. It might be thought that this question lost its importance after the decline of scholasticism in the modern period. However, the fourteen contributions contained in The Problem of Univerals in Early Modern Philosophy indicate that the issue of universals retained its vitality in modern philosophy. Modern philosophers in fact were interested in 3 sets of issues concerning universals: (i) issues concerning the ontological status of universals, (ii) issues concerning the psychology of the formation of universal concepts or terms, and (iii) issues concerning the value and use of universal concepts or terms in the acquisition of knowledge. Chapters in this volume consider the various forms of ""Platonism,"" ""conceptualism"" and ""nominalism"" (and distinctive combinations thereof) that emerged from the consideration of such issues in the work of modern philosophers. Furthermore, this volume covers not only the canonical modern figures, namely, Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, Hume and Kant, but also more neglected figures such as Pierre Gassendi, Pierre-Sylvain Regis, Nicolas Malebranche, Henry More, Ralph Cudworth and John Norris. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Stefano Di Bella (University of Milan) , Professor of Philosophy Tad M Schmaltz (University of Michigan)Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA Imprint: Oxford University Press, USA ISBN: 9780190608064ISBN 10: 0190608064 Publication Date: 28 July 2017 Audience: General/trade , General Format: Undefined Publisher's Status: Active Availability: In Print ![]() This item will be ordered in for you from one of our suppliers. Upon receipt, we will promptly dispatch it out to you. For in store availability, please contact us. Table of ContentsReviewsThis collection is a fine contribution to this new view of the early moderns, one which enrichens our understanding of their deeper commitments and attitudes. No self-respecting academic library should be without this title, and no historian of early modern philosophy should be ignorant of it. --Benjamin Hill, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews Author InformationStephano Di Bella is Professor of The History of Philosophy at the University of Milan. Tad Schmaltz is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Michigan. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |