|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewWhen is it morally permissible to engage in self-defense or the defense of others? Jonathan Quong defends a variety of novel ideas in this book about the morality of defensive force, providing an original philosophical account of the central moral principles that should regulate its use. We cannot understand the morality of defensive force, he reasons, until we ask and answer deeper questions about how the use of defensive force fits with a more general account of justice and moral rights. In developing this stance, Quong presents new views on liability, proportionality, and necessity. He argues that self-defense can sometimes be justified on the basis of an agent-relative prerogative to give greater weight to one's own life and interests, contrary to the dominant view in the literature. Additionally Quong develops a novel conception of individual rights against harm. Unlike some, who believe that our rights against harm are fact-relative, he argues that our rights against being harmed by others must, in certain respects, be sensitive to the evidence that others can reasonably be expected to possess. The book concludes with Quong's extended defense of the means principle, a principle that prohibits harmfully using other persons' bodies or other rightful property unless those persons are duty bound to permit this use or have otherwise waived their claims against such use. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Jonathan Quong (University of Southern California)Publisher: Oxford University Press Imprint: Oxford University Press Dimensions: Width: 16.00cm , Height: 1.80cm , Length: 24.20cm Weight: 0.490kg ISBN: 9780198851103ISBN 10: 0198851103 Pages: 228 Publication Date: 17 March 2020 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: To order ![]() Stock availability from the supplier is unknown. We will order it for you and ship this item to you once it is received by us. Table of ContentsReviewsAmong its many virtues, The Morality of Defensive Force offers a sustained and powerful critique of the moral responsibility account. * Michael Otsuka, Criminal Law and Philosophy * The Morality of Defensive Force is packed with forceful, novel arguments. It will no doubt become a cornerstone of work on the justifications and limits of defensive harm. It strikes a great balance between being accessible to those who want to pick it up for a particular topic-for example, those interested only in the necessity condition, the bearing of evidence on rights, or the means principle-and at the same time being a rewarding, well-integrated read. * Joseph Bowen, Ethics * The Morality of Defensive Force is packed with forceful, novel arguments. It will no doubt become a cornerstone of work on the justifications and limits of defensive harm. It strikes a great balance between being accessible to those who want to pick it up for a particular topic-for example, those interested only in the necessity condition, the bearing of evidence on rights, or the means principle-and at the same time being a rewarding, well-integrated read. * Joseph Bowen, Ethics * Author InformationJonathan Quong is Professor of Philosophy and Law at the University of Southern California. He taught previously at the University of Manchester. He is an associate editor for Philosophy & Public Affairs, an associate editor for Ethics, and an area editor for Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |