Overview

Full Product Details

9780197765210

Table of Contents

Reviews

The End of Engagement is an astonishing and pathbreaking study. Sociologist David McCourt digs beneath the veneer of Sino-American and US-Russia relations to examine the twin communities of America's leading China and Russia specialists themselves. He astutely reveals how these experts have grappled with the repressive and revisionist turns of Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin--but, more importantly, how the longstanding American policies of 'engagement' of each power have been shaken and forced to adapt to disturbing new realities. This is political sociology at its best, the comparative perspective is illuminating, and it should be carefully read inside and outside the Washington Beltway. * David Shambaugh, George Washington University and The Hoover Institution * A phenomenal must-read. McCourt's book identifies and explains the essential process role played by foreign policy experts in generating the policy ideas for the executive and legislative branches to fight over and providing the people to implement (or challenge) those policies. By showing how real people, \ not the pejorative 'Blob,' struggle over bitter ideological, policy, and personal disagreements, McCourt unveils the fault lines of contemporary American \ foreign policy challenges: whether, in a post-unipolar world, the US should engage with Russia and China as they are or to try and contain those countries to reshape their policies? This dichotomy between engagement and containment is one of the best studies of interests versus values committed to paper in many years. * Yuval Weber, Texas A&M University * The End of Engagement stands as a landmark contribution to the study of U.S. foreign policy. Its sociological lens challenges established narratives, providing nuanced insights into the intersections of expertise, power, and international strategy. For scholars, policymakers, and readers seeking a deeper understanding of the mechanisms shaping policy decision-making, McCourt's work is both essential and thought-provoking, opening new avenues for exploring how epistemic communities influence the architecture of global relations. * STEFAN MESSINGSCHLAGER, Archiv für Sozialgeschichte * McCourt provides an interesting perspective, and his interviews add an important dimension to the still-unfolding story of the end of engagement and its consequences. * L. M. Lees, CHOICE * McCourt's painstaking efforts to go beyond the 'hawks versus doves' classification and to examine the divisions within America's China and Russia fieldsis admirable. * Olivia Cheung, International Affairs *

The End of Engagement is an astonishing and pathbreaking study. Sociologist David McCourt digs beneath the veneer of Sino-American and US-Russia relations to examine the twin communities of America's leading China and Russia specialists themselves. He astutely reveals how these experts have grappled with the repressive and revisionist turns of Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin--but, more importantly, how the longstanding American policies of 'engagement' of each power have been shaken and forced to adapt to disturbing new realities. This is political sociology at its best, the comparative perspective is illuminating, and it should be carefully read inside and outside the Washington Beltway. * David Shambaugh, George Washington University and The Hoover Institution * A phenomenal must-read. McCourt's book identifies and explains the essential process role played by foreign policy experts in generating the policy ideas for the executive and legislative branches to fight over and providing the people to implement (or challenge) those policies. By showing how real people, \ not the pejorative 'Blob,' struggle over bitter ideological, policy, and personal disagreements, McCourt unveils the fault lines of contemporary American \ foreign policy challenges: whether, in a post-unipolar world, the US should engage with Russia and China as they are or to try and contain those countries to reshape their policies? This dichotomy between engagement and containment is one of the best studies of interests versus values committed to paper in many years. * Yuval Weber, Texas A&M University * The End of Engagement stands as a landmark contribution to the study of U.S. foreign policy. Its sociological lens challenges established narratives, providing nuanced insights into the intersections of expertise, power, and international strategy. For scholars, policymakers, and readers seeking a deeper understanding of the mechanisms shaping policy decision-making, McCourt's work is both essential and thought-provoking, opening new avenues for exploring how epistemic communities influence the architecture of global relations. * STEFAN MESSINGSCHLAGER, Archiv für Sozialgeschichte * McCourt provides an interesting perspective, and his interviews add an important dimension to the still-unfolding story of the end of engagement and its consequences. * L. M. Lees, CHOICE *

The End of Engagement is an astonishing and pathbreaking study. Sociologist David McCourt digs beneath the veneer of Sino-American and US-Russia relations to examine the twin communities of America's leading China and Russia specialists themselves. He astutely reveals how these experts have grappled with the repressive and revisionist turns of Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin--but, more importantly, how the longstanding American policies of 'engagement' of each power have been shaken and forced to adapt to disturbing new realities. This is political sociology at its best, the comparative perspective is illuminating, and it should be carefully read inside and outside the Washington Beltway. * David Shambaugh, George Washington University and The Hoover Institution * A phenomenal must-read. McCourt's book identifies and explains the essential process role played by foreign policy experts in generating the policy ideas for the executive and legislative branches to fight over and providing the people to implement (or challenge) those policies. By showing how real people, \ not the pejorative 'Blob,' struggle over bitter ideological, policy, and personal disagreements, McCourt unveils the fault lines of contemporary American \ foreign policy challenges: whether, in a post-unipolar world, the US should engage with Russia and China as they are or to try and contain those countries to reshape their policies? This dichotomy between engagement and containment is one of the best studies of interests versus values committed to paper in many years. * Yuval Weber, Texas A&M University *

Author Information

David M. McCourt is an international political sociologist and Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of California, Davis. His primary research interests lie with the social sources of state action in international politics, with an empirical focus on the United Kingdom, the United States, and the European Union. He completed his graduate work at the European University Institute in Florence, Italy. Between 2012 and 2014, he was a Lecturer in International Politics at the University of Sheffield (UK). He is the author, among other works, of Britain and World Power Since 1945 (2014), American Power and International Theory at the Council on Foreign Relations, 1953-54 (2020), and The New Constructivism in International Relations Theory (2022).

Tab Content 6

Countries Available