|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewA no-holds-barred, controversial expose of the financial profiteering and ambiguous ethics that pervade the world of humanitarian aid A vast industry has grown up around humanitarian aid: a cavalcade of organizations--some 37,000--compete for a share of the $160 billion annual prize, with fact-inflation sometimes ramping up disaster coverage to draw in more funds. Insurgents and warring governments, meanwhile, have made aid a permanent feature of military strategy: refugee camps serve as base camps for genocidaires, and aid supplies are diverted to feed the troops. Even as humanitarian groups continue to assert the holy principle of impartiality, they have increasingly become participants in aid's abuses. In a narrative that is impassioned, gripping, and even darkly absurd, journalist Linda Polman takes us to war zones around the globe--from the NGO-dense operations in Afghaniscam to the floating clinics of Texas Mercy Ships proselytizing off the shores of West Africa--to show the often compromised results of aid workers' best intentions. It is time, Polman argues, to impose ethical boundaries, to question whether doing something is always better than doing nothing, and to hold humanitarians responsible for the consequences of their deeds. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Linda Polman , Liz WatersPublisher: Metropolitan Books Imprint: Metropolitan Books Dimensions: Width: 14.70cm , Height: 2.50cm , Length: 21.60cm Weight: 0.349kg ISBN: 9780805092905ISBN 10: 0805092900 Pages: 229 Publication Date: 14 September 2010 Audience: General/trade , General Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Out of Stock Indefinitely Availability: In Print ![]() Limited stock is available. It will be ordered for you and shipped pending supplier's limited stock. Language: Dutch & English Table of ContentsReviewsParticularly timely just now... Polman finds moral hazard on display wherever aid workers are deployed. In case after case, a persuasive argument can be made that, over-all, humanitarian aid did as much or even more harm than good... Her style is brusque, hard-boiled, with a satirist's taste for gallows humor. Her basic stance is: J'accuse . <br>--Philip Gourevitch, The New Yorker <br> Author InformationTab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |