Overview

The confidence industry has a dirty secret: the science doesn't back it up. Every year, millions of people attend confidence seminars, read confidence books, and rehearse power poses before high-stakes meetings. They've been told that confidence is the missing ingredient-that if they could just project more certainty, success would follow. The research says otherwise. In The Confidence Con, researcher and writer Gray Mercer draws on decades of peer-reviewed science to expose one of the most expensive myths in modern culture: that confidence predicts competence. It doesn't. In study after study, the most confident people in the room are the least accurate, the least open to correction, and the most likely to make decisions that everyone else ends up paying for. From the Dunning-Kruger effect to the boardroom to the gender confidence gap-the data tells a consistent, uncomfortable story: we have built systems that reward the performance of certainty over the real thing, promote the wrong people into leadership, and actively punish the honest acknowledgment of doubt. The Confidence Con covers: Why the self-esteem movement failed-and what it left behind How overconfident leaders rise, persist, and eventually wreck organizations The real story behind the gender confidence gap (hint: it's not what you've been told) When confidence kills-medicine, aviation, and the high cost of certainty What calibrated confidence actually looks like, and how to build it This is not an argument against ambition. It is an argument for accuracy-and for the quiet, competent people who have been losing to louder, wronger voices for far too long. The data has always been there. Someone just needed to tell you what it said.

Full Product Details

9798249872793

Table of Contents

Reviews

Author Information

Tab Content 6

Countries Available