Full Product Details
Author: Frederick Adams (University of Delaware, USA) ,
Kenneth Aizawa (Centenary College of Louisiana, USA)
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Inc
Imprint: John Wiley & Sons Inc
Dimensions:
Width: 15.20cm
, Height: 1.80cm
, Length: 23.10cm
Weight: 0.327kg
ISBN: 9781444332704
ISBN 10: 1444332708
Pages: 224
Publication Date: 22 January 2010
Audience:
Professional and scholarly
,
Professional & Vocational
Format: Paperback
Publisher's Status: Active
Availability: Out of stock
The supplier is temporarily out of stock of this item. It will be ordered for you on backorder and shipped when it becomes available.
Reviews
Where is human cognition located? Is human cognitive processing literally constituted (at least partly) by non-neural portions of the environment? The contemporary debate about extended cognition and the extended mind focuses on these questions, among others. Frederick Adams and Kenneth Aizawa's new book, The Bounds of Cognition (BC), contributes wonderfully to this debate. The book is critical of the extended approach; but Adams and Aizawa (A&A) also work toward a positive view, one that allows, in principle, for extended cognition, while yielding very little of it when fed the empirical facts. (Philosophical Psychology, November 2010) “The Bounds of Cognition is the most thorough-going, forceful, and compelling critique of EMH so far. ( Erkenntnis, September 2009) [This book] is without question a worthy and timely challenge to extended cognition, as well as to areas in related enterprises such as embodied cognition, situated cognition, dynamical systems theory and artificial life... I recommend the book highly to anyone interested in these issues. (Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, June 2009) This is a well written, well argued book. Written by philosophers mainly for philosophers... It makes a serious contribution to the extended cognition debate that anyone with a serious interest in the issue needs to study. (Journal of Consciousness Studies, January 2009) Advocates of EMT must undoubtedly examine the arguments and criticisms that Adams and Aizawa offer in careful detail, because The Bounds of Cognition is the most forceful and most convincing criticism of their position so far. (Metapsychology, October 2008) “The [authors] wrote this book as a reasoned challenge … .[It] offers an excellent overview of the promise, limits, and problems of bounded cognition. Recommended. (Choice)
The Bounds of Cognition is the most thorough-going, forceful, and compelling critique of EMH so far. ( Erkenntnis, September 2009) [This book] is without question a worthy and timely challenge to extended cognition, as well as to areas in related enterprises such as embodied cognition, situated cognition, dynamical systems theory and artificial life... I recommend the book highly to anyone interested in these issues. (Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, June 2009) This is a well written, well argued book. Written by philosophers mainly for philosophers... It makes a serious contribution to the extended cognition debate that anyone with a serious interest in the issue needs to study. (Journal of Consciousness Studies, January 2009) Advocates of EMT must undoubtedly examine the arguments and criticisms that Adams and Aizawa offer in careful detail, because The Bounds of Cognition is the most forceful and most convincing criticism of their position so far. (Metapsychology, October 2008) The [authors] wrote this book as a reasoned challenge ... .[It] offers an excellent overview of the promise, limits, and problems of bounded cognition. Recommended. (Choice)<!--end-->
Where is human cognition located? Is human cognitive processing literally constituted (at least partly) by non-neural portions of the environment? The contemporary debate about extended cognition and the extended mind focuses on these questions, among others. Frederick Adams and Kenneth Aizawa's new book, The Bounds of Cognition (BC), contributes wonderfully to this debate. The book is critical of the extended approach; but Adams and Aizawa (A&A) also work toward a positive view, one that allows, in principle, for extended cognition, while yielding very little of it when fed the empirical facts. (Philosophical Psychology, November 2010) ?The Bounds of Cognition is the most thorough-going, forceful, and compelling critique of EMH so far.? ( Erkenntnis, September 2009) [This book] is without question a worthy and timely challenge to extended cognition, as well as to areas in related enterprises such as embodied cognition, situated cognition, dynamical systems theory and artificial life.... I recommend the book highly to anyone interested in these issues. (Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, June 2009) This is a well written, well argued book. Written by philosophers mainly for philosophers.... It makes a serious contribution to the extended cognition debate that anyone with a serious interest in the issue needs to study. (Journal of Consciousness Studies, January 2009) Advocates of EMT must undoubtedly examine the arguments and criticisms that Adams and Aizawa offer in careful detail, because The Bounds of Cognition is the most forceful and most convincing criticism of their position so far. (Metapsychology, October 2008) ?The [authors] wrote this book as a reasoned challenge ? .[It] offers an excellent overview of the promise, limits, and problems of bounded cognition. Recommended.? (Choice) Adams and Aizawa have written a book that is going to leave more than a few researchers in the burgeoning field of embodied cognition scratching their heads and wondering how they could have said those things. In a detailed study, Adams and Aizawa question the very foundations of embodied cognition while on the way elaborating a series of challenges that those who wish to continue in the pursuit of embodied cognition must first address. -Lawrence A. Shapiro, University of Wisconsin Adams and Aizawa provide a timely and important critique of an emerging set of views and arguments often referred to as the ?extended mind.? Anyone interested in the current state of arguments about the extended mind and the future direction of cognitive science will want to read this book. I look forward to responding to the arguments. -Richard Menary, The University of Wollongong, Australia
Where is human cognition located? Is human cognitive processing literally constituted (at least partly) by non-neural portions of the environment? The contemporary debate about extended cognition and the extended mind focuses on these questions, among others. Frederick Adams and Kenneth Aizawa's new book, The Bounds of Cognition (BC), contributes wonderfully to this debate. The book is critical of the extended approach; but Adams and Aizawa (A&A) also work toward a positive view, one that allows, in principle, for extended cognition, while yielding very little of it when fed the empirical facts. ( Philosophical Psychology, November 2010) The Bounds of Cognition is the most thorough-going, forceful, and compelling critique of EMH so far. ( Erkenntnis , September 2009) [This book] is without question a worthy and timely challenge to extended cognition, as well as to areas in related enterprises such as embodied cognition, situated cognition, dynamical systems theory and artificial life... I recommend the book highly to anyone interested in these issues. ( Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences , June 2009) This is a well written, well argued book. Written by philosophers mainly for philosophers... It makes a serious contribution to the extended cognition debate that anyone with a serious interest in the issue needs to study. ( Journal of Consciousness Studies , January 2009) Advocates of EMT must undoubtedly examine the arguments and criticisms that Adams and Aizawa offer in careful detail, because The Bounds of Cognition is the most forceful and most convincing criticism of their position so far. ( Metapsychology , October 2008) The [authors] wrote this book as a reasoned challenge ... .[It] offers an excellent overview of the promise, limits, and problems of bounded cognition. Recommended. ( Choice)
Author Information
FREDERICK ADAMS is Professor of Cognitive Science & Philosophy and Chair of Linguistics and Cognitive Science at the University of Delaware. He is also director of the Delaware Program in Cognitive Science. He publishes in epistemology, philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, and philosophy of science. KENNETH AIZAWA is Charles T. Beaird Professor of Philosophy in the Department of Philosophy at Centenary College of Louisiana and is the author of The Systematicity Arguments (2003).
