|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewWhat should literature with political aims look like? This book traces two rival responses to this question, one prizing clarity and the other confusion, which have dominated political aesthetics since the late nineteenth century. Revisiting recurrences of the avant-garde experimentalism versus critical realism debates from the twentieth century, Geoffrey A. Baker highlights the often violent reductions at work in earlier debates. Instead of prizing one approach over the other, as many participants in those debates have done, Baker focuses on the manner in which the debate itself between these approaches continues to prove productive and enabling for politically engaged writers. This book thus offers a way beyond the simplistic polarity of realism vs. anti-realism in a study that is focused on influential strands of thought in England, France, and Germany and that covers well-known authors such as Zola, Nietzsche, Arnold, Mann, Brecht, Sartre, Adorno, Lukács, Beauvoir, Morrison, and Coetzee. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Geoffrey A. BakerPublisher: Springer International Publishing AG Imprint: Springer International Publishing AG Edition: Softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 2016 Dimensions: Width: 14.80cm , Height: 1.60cm , Length: 21.00cm Weight: 0.454kg ISBN: 9783319825175ISBN 10: 3319825178 Pages: 279 Publication Date: 07 July 2018 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Paperback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Manufactured on demand ![]() We will order this item for you from a manufactured on demand supplier. Table of ContentsTable of Contents Preface and Acknowledgements Introduction: Literary Activism, Clarity and Confusion I. Sartre and the Aesthetic of Clarity II. Adorno and the Aesthetic of Confusion III. The Use(lessness) of Literature and Language Part I: Naturalists and Nietzscheans: Codifying Clarity and Confusion Chapter 1: “For Love of Clarity”: Émile Zola, Practice, and the Political Potential of Realistic Literature I. “Tout voir, tout savoir”: Seeing as Knowing II. Content to Know III. The Practical Uses of Clarity Chapter 2: Grounds for Confusion: Nietzsche, Theory, and the Political Potential of Anti-Realism I. “Das Problem der Wissenschaft”: Against Knowing II. “Clarity Bordering on Stupidity”: The Form of Confusion III. The Practical Uses of Confusion Part II: Ambiguities of Activism: Complicating Clarity and Confusion Chapter 3: Between Theory and Practice: Matthew Arnold, Thomas Mann, Julien Benda, and the Purpose of the Intellectual I. “Apostle[s] of Political Detachment”? II. Criticism between Clarity and Confusion III. Criticism as Activism IV. Between Theory and Practice, Still Chapter 4: “Different Kinds of Clarity”: Science, Sense, and Utilitarian Realism in Bertolt Brecht I. Naturalist Brecht? II. The Sense of Brecht III. “The Truth is Concrete”: Brecht’s Materialism IV. “That Brechtian Usefulness” Chapter 5: Pressing Engagement: Jean-Paul Sartre and the Aesthetic Problem of the Political I. Communication, Clarity, and Confusion II. Forms of Engagement: Confusing Sartre III. To Change the Subject: Narcissistic Activism Chapter 6: An Other Engagement: Simone de Beauvoir and the Ethical Problem of the Political I. The Problem of Engagement II. The Aesthetics and Ethics of Engagement in The Mandarins Conclusion: Contemporary Engagements with Clarity and Confusion I. Peter Handke: From the Ivory Tower II. Toni Morrison: “How to See without Pictures” III. J.M Coetzee: “Surprising Involvement” Works CitedReviewsAuthor InformationGeoffrey A. Baker is Associate Professor of Humanities (Literature) at Yale-NUS College, Singapore. He is the author of Realism’s Empire, in addition to articles on political aesthetics, realism, and other topics. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |