|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewDuring the 1980s, Australia remade its 'adult guardianship' laws that governed people unable to manage their own affairs or property. The reforms embraced UN principles and took a common pattern with reformist North American and European countries - with one key exception. The rest of the world chose courts to administer the laws; Australia created specialist multi-disciplinary tribunals. This book compares the work of guardianship tribunals and courts and argues forcefully that Australia's adult guardianship experiment in popular justice is a success. Carney and Tait present work on the Australian tribunals in NSW and Victoria and compare them with overseas studies on courts (and the Family Court of Australia). On every measure tribunals outperform courts. They are more inclusive. They pay more attention to social context and functioning, and are better at incorporating the affected person into the hearing, striking an 'alliance' with them. Courts, by contrast, favour alliances with families and the medical profession. Even in areas where courts might be expected to perform better, they are less successful than the tribunals, collecting and testing evidence and avoiding unnecessary intervention. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Terry Carney , David taitPublisher: Federation Press Imprint: Federation Press Dimensions: Width: 13.80cm , Height: 1.20cm , Length: 23.00cm Weight: 0.258kg ISBN: 9781862872646ISBN 10: 1862872643 Pages: 240 Publication Date: December 1997 Audience: College/higher education , General/trade , Professional and scholarly , Tertiary & Higher Education , General Format: Paperback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: In Print ![]() This item will be ordered in for you from one of our suppliers. Upon receipt, we will promptly dispatch it out to you. For in store availability, please contact us. Table of ContentsReviewsThis work stands as an important contribution to our understanding of the practice of guardianship boards and tribunals. ... It] focuses on what it calls narratives of guardianship , that is how tribunals handle evidence and reach their decisions. ...[It] is instructive, leading the reader to consider issues of both theory and practice. It is considered in its conclusions, which appear well supported and argued ... Inclusion in the text of case-study material including matters of money management, self-harm and sterilisation gives it a richness and relevance that will be readily appreciated by guardianship practitioners. This book is essential reading for all involved in substitute decision making. - Journal of Family Studies, Vol 7 No 2, (Oct 2001) Author InformationTab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |