Free Delivery Over $100
|
|
|||
|
||||
OverviewOn the 27th of September 1968, the six EC Member States signed the Brussels Convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. 50 years later, the European Court of Justice and the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg organised an international conference on the major developments, achievements and challenges of the European law of civil procedure. This book brings together contributions written by members of the Court of Justice of the European Union, established academics and young researchers reflecting on the Brussels Regime. It offers insights on the dialogue between the Court of Justice and national courts on the interpretation of the European law of civil procedure and how it shaped the Europeanisation of private international law. Beyond this assessment of the past, the book offers some reflections on the future architecture of the European law of civil procedure and the suitability of the Brussels regime to the challenges of the current era. This will be read with interest by academics, practitioners and policy-makers. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Professor Dr Burkhard Hess (Max Planck Institute, Luxembourg) , Koen Lenaerts (European Court of Justice, Luxembourg)Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC Imprint: Nomos/Hart Weight: 0.864kg ISBN: 9781509945924ISBN 10: 150994592 Pages: 608 Publication Date: 01 October 2020 Audience: College/higher education , Tertiary & Higher Education Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: In Print  This item will be ordered in for you from one of our suppliers. Upon receipt, we will promptly dispatch it out to you. For in store availability, please contact us. Table of ContentsSeminal Judgments (les Grands Arrets) in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice Burkhard Hess La confiance mutuelle, fondement et temoignage de la valeur de l’Union europeenne Camelia Toader De l’encadrement de l’ordre public procedural des Etats membres a l’ordre procedural autonome de l’Union Marek Safjan et Dominik Dusterhaus EU Private International Law: Consistency of the Scopes of Application and/or of the Solutions Maciej Szpunar Le « regime Bruxelles » dans le droit europeen de la procedure civile Marta Requejo Isidro The Shift from a Choice of Law-Centred Approach to a Civil Procedure Standpoint Sabine Corneloup The Contribution of ‘Brussels I’ to the Process of EU Integration: a True Trailblazer for the Europeanization and Constitutionalization of Private International Law Johan Meeusen The Application of the European Law of Civil Procedure in the Dialogue Between the CJEU and the National Judges Henrik Saugmandsgaard Oe The Dialogue on the European Law of Civil Procedure between the Court of Justice and National Courts from a German Perspective Wolfgang Hau European Civil Procedure and the Dialogue between National Courts and the European Court of Justice Xandra Kramer & Jos Hoevenaars L’autonomie procedurale dans la jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l’Union europeenne – Reflexions naives d’un Huron au Palais du Kirchberg Loic Cadiet La Charte des droits fondamentaux et les nouvelles frontieres de l’autonomie procedurale des Etats membres L’exemple du droit europeen de la procedure civile Michail Vilaras The Brussels Convention: 50 Years of Contribution to European Integration Fausto Pocar Delendum est Forum Delicti? Towards the Jurisdictional Protection of the Alleged Victim in Cross-Border Torts Etienne Farnoux CJEU Case-Law and Forum Connexitatis: an Analysis of the Close Connection Criterion Lucilla Galanti Cross-border Collective Redress and the Jurisdictional Regime: Horizontal vs Sectoral Approach Cinzia Peraro Your Place? Mine? Or Theirs? A Legal and Policy-orientated Analysis of Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Collective Redress Stephanie Law Representative (Consumer) Collective Redress Decisions in the EU: Free Movement or Public Policy Obstacles? Janek Tomasz Nowak Casting the Net: Has the Court of Justice’s Approach to Online Torts Made the Brussels Framework Fit for the Internet Age? Tobias Lutzi Encoding Justice: A Quest for Facilitating Access to Justice by e-Handling of Cross-Border Litigation. The Example of the European Uniform Procedures Elena Alina Ontanu Trust, but Verify. Loss of Mutual Trust as a Ground for Non-Recognition in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. Example of the Judiciary Crisis in Poland Zuzanna WitekReviewsAuthor InformationBurkard Hess is Director of the Department of European and Comparative Law, MPI Luxembourg. Koen Lenaerts is President of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Professor of European Law at the University of Leuven. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |
||||
