|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewAre witnesses, jurors, or others in courtrooms distracted by in-court television cameras and their operators? Citing a lack of evidence one way or the other, the US Supreme Court has recommended additional research on the matter. Answering the court’s recommendation, this proof-of-concept study demonstrates for the first time that eye-tracking technology can now accurately determine whether courtroom actors look at the television cameras in the courtroom and for how long. In doing so, Television Courtroom Broadcasting opens the door to a new era of research on the effects of in-court distraction. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Paul LambertPublisher: Intellect Imprint: Intellect Books Dimensions: Width: 17.80cm , Height: 1.40cm , Length: 22.90cm Weight: 0.581kg ISBN: 9781841506470ISBN 10: 1841506478 Pages: 223 Publication Date: 15 December 2012 Audience: College/higher education , Professional and scholarly , Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Available To Order ![]() We have confirmation that this item is in stock with the supplier. It will be ordered in for you and dispatched immediately. Table of ContentsChapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: Empirical Effects Studies Chapter 3: Considering Distraction Effects Research Chapter 4: Effects and Courtroom Participants/Actors Chapter 5: Distraction and General Research Studies Chapter 6: Legal-psychology and Eye-tracking Chapter 7: The Eye-tracking Distraction Solution Chapter 8: The First TCB Eye-tracking Demonstration Chapter 9: The Judge Chapter 10: The Witness Chapter 11: The Solicitor/Barrister/Lawyer Chapter 12: Location Issues Chapter 13: Conclusion Appendix 1: Diagrams from Short Report StudyReviews'In Television Courtroom Broadcasting: Distraction Effects and Eye Tracking, Paul Lambert tackles a very sensitive and controversial topic - Television Courtroom Broadcasting and its effects, which has been actively or passively ostracized not only by government, law departments, but by the scientific community as well. With this book, he showed that a New World of research on the effects of in-court distraction is waiting. In fact, eye tracking kills the subjective reports stars and eye movements, as true direct measure of importance, should serve in future, as a reliable source of information for Judges, Lawyers and Policy-makers.' -- Pedro J. Rosa Clinical Psychologist, MSc 'Lambert has provided a strong argument for the experimental study of distraction in the courtroom due to television broadcasting. Specifically, he makes a compelling case for the use of eye tracking technology as one of the key methods to be employed. This initial foray into courtroom distraction is likely to encourage those involved in courtroom activities to pursue experimental evidence for distraction, and to encourage those engaged in applied research methods to consider the courtroom as an exciting new field to exercise their hypotheses. As a focal point for bringing these two groups together, this book cannot be faulted, and we will hopefully see a new field of courtroom research develop over the next decade which will trace its lineage back to this publication.' -- Dr. David Crundall Director of the Nottingham Integrated Transport and Environment Simulation facility (NITES), University of Nottingham 'It does well in emphasising the need for further empirical research in this area and the valuable role eye tracking technology can play in this debate' -- SCRIPTed, Yolande Stolte 'A very useful book' -- Revista Aranzadi de derecho y nuevas tecnologias / Journal Aranzadi of Rights and New Technologies, Jose M. Banos Fos 'A very useful book' -- Revista Aranzadi de derecho y nuevas tecnologias / Journal Aranzadi of Rights and New Technologies, Jose M. Banos Fos 'It does well in emphasising the need for further empirical research in this area and the valuable role eye tracking technology can play in this debate' -- SCRIPTed, Yolande Stolte 'Lambert has provided a strong argument for the experimental study of distraction in the courtroom due to television broadcasting. Specifically, he makes a compelling case for the use of eye tracking technology as one of the key methods to be employed. This initial foray into courtroom distraction is likely to encourage those involved in courtroom activities to pursue experimental evidence for distraction, and to encourage those engaged in applied research methods to consider the courtroom as an exciting new field to exercise their hypotheses. As a focal point for bringing these two groups together, this book cannot be faulted, and we will hopefully see a new field of courtroom research develop over the next decade which will trace its lineage back to this publication.' -- Dr. David Crundall Director of the Nottingham Integrated Transport and Environment Simulation facility (NITES), University of Nottingham 'In Television Courtroom Broadcasting: Distraction Effects and Eye Tracking, Paul Lambert tackles a very sensitive and controversial topic - Television Courtroom Broadcasting and its effects, which has been actively or passively ostracized not only by government, law departments, but by the scientific community as well. With this book, he showed that a New World of research on the effects of in-court distraction is waiting. In fact, eye tracking kills the subjective reports stars and eye movements, as true direct measure of importance, should serve in future, as a reliable source of information for Judges, Lawyers and Policy-makers.' -- Pedro J. Rosa Clinical Psychologist, MSc Author InformationPaul Lambert is a lecturer, lawyer, and writer. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |