|
|
|||
|
||||
OverviewSubjection and Subjectivity offers an account of moral subjectivity and moral reflection designed to meet the needs of feminism as well as other emancipatory movements. Diana Tietjens Meyers argues that impartial reason - the approach to moral reflection which has dominated 20th century Anglo-American philosophy and judicial reasoning - is inadequate for addressing real world injustices. Dealing with problems of group-based social exclusion requires empathy with others. But empathy often becomes distorted by prejudicial attitudes which may be publicly condemned but continue to be transmitted through cultural figurations. Meyers argues that it is a mistake to view the moral subject as independent, transparent and rational. Instead, she presents a picture of a heterogeneous and pluralistic subject, one that is defined by ties to other people, liable to misunderstand its own motives, and in need of a repertory of strategies for purposes of moral reflection. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Diana T. MeyersPublisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd Imprint: Routledge Dimensions: Width: 15.20cm , Height: 1.50cm , Length: 22.90cm Weight: 0.390kg ISBN: 9780415905084ISBN 10: 0415905087 Pages: 210 Publication Date: 24 October 1994 Audience: College/higher education , General/trade , Tertiary & Higher Education , General Format: Paperback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: In Print This item will be ordered in for you from one of our suppliers. Upon receipt, we will promptly dispatch it out to you. For in store availability, please contact us. Table of ContentsReviews""In Subjection and Subjectivity Professor Meyers has grasped an idea that ought to have been clear to us all but has eluded us until now: that the explorations of a depth psychology are crucial to formulating a theory of moral personality. Moreover, that the revisions and investigations by feminists into the possibilities of an adequate theory of personality afforded by psychoanalysis is a field rife for concepts useful for the feminist project of reorienting ethics to include issues of gender and differences. Meyers digs deep into this plentitude. And she extracts many important conceptions. Foremost amongst these riches are the idea of emphatic thought, dissident speech, the role of figuration in the perpetuation of prejudice against differences, and the heterogeneous self. The coup de grace is the development of a distinctive and powerful conception of moral subjectivity--one adequate to resist subjection."" -- Eva Feder Kittay, State University of New York, Stony Broo ""In Subjection and Subjectivity Diana Meyers constructs a meeting place for feminism, psychoanalysis, and moral philosophy, and this original conjuncture puts interesting demands on each: psychoanalysis must justify its political relevance, feminism must field a psychology as well as politics, and ethics has to reckon with profound and intractable social problems that (astonishingly) scarcely appear in the Anglo-American literature."" -- Margaret Walker, Fordham University In Subjection and Subjectivity Professor Meyers has grasped an idea that ought to have been clear to us all but has eluded us until now: that the explorations of a depth psychology are crucial to formulating a theory of moral personality. Moreover, that the revisions and investigations by feminists into the possibilities of an adequate theory of personality afforded by psychoanalysis is a field rife for concepts useful for the feminist project of reorienting ethics to include issues of gender and differences. Meyers digs deep into this plentitude. And she extracts many important conceptions. Foremost amongst these riches are the idea of emphatic thought, dissident speech, the role of figuration in the perpetuation of prejudice against differences, and the heterogeneous self. The coup de grace is the development of a distinctive and powerful conception of moral subjectivity--one adequate to resist subjection. <br>-Eva Feder Kittay, State University of New York, Stony Broo <br> In Subjection and Subjectivity Diana Meyers constructs a meeting place for feminism, psychoanalysis, and moral philosophy, and this original conjuncture puts interesting demands on each: psychoanalysis must justify its political relevance, feminism must field a psychology as well as politics, and ethics has to reckon with profound and intractable social problems that (astonishingly) scarcely appear in the Anglo-American literature. <br>-Margaret Walker, Fordham University <br> Author InformationDiana Tietjens Meyers is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Connecticut. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |
||||