|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewWhy do religion and science often appear in conflict in America’s public sphere? In Seeking Good Debate, Michael S. Evans examines the results from the first-ever study to combine large-scale empirical analysis of some of our foremost religion and science debates with in-depth research into what Americans actually want in the public sphere. The surprising finding is that apparent conflicts involving religion and science reflect a more fundamental conflict between media elites and ordinary Americans over what is good debate. For elite representatives, good debate advances an agenda, but, as Evans shows, for many Americans it is defined by engagement and deliberation. This hidden conflict over what constitutes debate’s proper role diminishes the possibility for science and religion to be discussed meaningfully in public life. Challenging our understanding of science, religion, and conflict, Seeking Good Debate raises profound questions about the future of the public sphere and American democracy. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Michael S. EvansPublisher: University of California Press Imprint: University of California Press Dimensions: Width: 15.20cm , Height: 1.80cm , Length: 22.90cm Weight: 0.363kg ISBN: 9780520285088ISBN 10: 0520285085 Pages: 256 Publication Date: 16 February 2016 Audience: College/higher education , Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly Format: Paperback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Out of stock ![]() The supplier is temporarily out of stock of this item. It will be ordered for you on backorder and shipped when it becomes available. Table of ContentsList of Figures List of Tables Acknowledgments 1. Rethinking Religion and Science 2. Considering Conflict: Human Origins and Stem Cell Research 3. Potential Encounters: Origins of Homosexuality and Environmental Policy 4. Representatives and Good Debate 5. Ordinary Americans and Good Debate 6. Owning the Space: Religious Credibility in the Public Sphere 7. Religion and Bad Debate 8. Faceless Science: Scientific Credibility in the Public Sphere 9. Science and Bad Debate 10. The Future of Religion and Science in American Public Life Methodological Appendix Notes References IndexReviews[Evans'] surprising conclusion-that the problem is not that religion and science cannot engage in a good public debate, but that we don't have good forums and good representatives for carrying on those debates-is subtle but important. BOOM Evans' use of diverse methods is innovative. He moves between quantitative analysis and in-depth interviews, a unique approach to capture the multi-faceted cultural processes that underlie public discourse. * Sociology of Religion * [Evans'] surprising conclusion-that the problem is not that religion and science cannot engage in a good public debate, but that we don't have good forums and good representatives for carrying on those debates-is subtle but important. * BOOM * Author InformationMichael S.Evans is a Neukom Fellow at the Neukom Institute for Computational Science, Dartmouth College. He received a PhD in sociology from the Science Studies Program, University of California, San Diego. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |