|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewAlthough the first thing one learns about the 'Byzantine Empire' is that it was really the eastern Roman empire, scholars have preferred to call it 'Byzantine' in a repudiation of the self-conception and emic vocabulary of the inhabitants of that polity. The terminology of 'Byzantium' artificially severs the 'medieval' eastern Roman empire from its 'classical' roots allowing for the fundamentally Eurocentric schematization of history into 'ancient,' 'medieval,' and 'Renaissance' periods. 'Byzantine' is not a benign term of art but has served a variety of political and historiographical agendas including maintaining nationalist visions of ethnic continuity, creating precedents for communism, enabling politics of nostalgia for Orthodox dominion, and constructing visions of western European superiority and masculinity that justify colonialism. By exploring these intellectual legacies of 'Byzantium,' and the benefits of conceptualizing Roman history as an unsevered whole, this Element exhorts scholars to let go of the 'Byzantine' misnomer. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Leonora Neville (University of Wisconsin, Madison)Publisher: Cambridge University Press Imprint: Cambridge University Press ISBN: 9781009595551ISBN 10: 1009595555 Pages: 75 Publication Date: 31 July 2025 Audience: General/trade , General Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Forthcoming Availability: Not yet available ![]() This item is yet to be released. You can pre-order this item and we will dispatch it to you upon its release. Table of Contents1. Introduction: Names Matter; 2. Work Done by 'Byzantium'; 3. Reasons for Change; Conclusions; Bibliography.ReviewsAuthor InformationTab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |