|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewFull Product DetailsAuthor: Christopher W. TindalePublisher: SAGE Publications Inc Imprint: SAGE Publications Inc Dimensions: Width: 15.20cm , Height: 1.20cm , Length: 22.80cm Weight: 0.340kg ISBN: 9781412904001ISBN 10: 1412904005 Pages: 224 Publication Date: 20 July 2004 Audience: College/higher education , Tertiary & Higher Education Format: Paperback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: To order ![]() Stock availability from the supplier is unknown. We will order it for you and ship this item to you once it is received by us. Table of Contents1. Introduction: A Rhetorical Turn for Argumentation Alice′s Predicament Models of Argument Beyond the Logical Beyond the Dialectical Rhetoric and Rhetorical Argumentation The Path Ahead 2. Argument as Rhetorical... Introduction: Rhetoric′s Origin Argument′s Origin Rhetoric and Argument in Fifth- and Fourth- Century Greece Sophistic Argument Sophistic Argument and the Notion of ′Fallacy′ Rhetoric as Invitational 3. ...And Rhetoric as Argument Introduction: Rhetorical Figures and Arguments Reboul on Figures and Arguments Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca Fahnestock′s Figural Logic Figures as Arguments Conclusion 4. Rhetorical Contexts and the Dialogical Introduction: Dialogue and Dialogues Bakhtin′s Terminology Dialogic Argument Reflections on a Bakhtinian Model Examples Conclusion 5. Martians, Philosophers, and Reasonable People: The Construction of Objective Standards Introduction How Martians Reason The Martian Standard and the Problems of Evaluation Bakhtin′s Superaddressee Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca′s Universal Audience Conclusion 6. Developing the Universal Audience Introduction: Why the Universal Audience Fails Reading the Universal Audience: Two Views Reappraising the Universal Audience Applying the Idea of a Universal Audience 7. The Truth about Orangutans: Conflicting Criteria of Premise Adequacy Introduction: Deep Disagreements Between Logic and Rhetoric Hamblin′s Orangutans The Rhetoric of Philosophy: Metaphors as Argument Acceptability Conclusion 8. Rhetorical Conclusions From Protagoras to Bakhtin The Rhetorical Audience Goals of Rhetorical Argumentation Conclusions Without ConclusivenessReviewsAuthor InformationChristopher Tindale (Ph.D. & M.A., University of Waterloo; B.A., Wilfrid Laurier University) teaches and conducts research in the areas of argumentation theory, ethics, and ancient philosophy. Since 2000, he′s been an editor of the journal Informal Logic: Reasoning and Argumentation in Theory and Practice, and he presently sits on the editorial board of Controversia. He is the author of Acts of Arguing: A Rhetorical Model of Argument (SUNY Press, 1999), co-author of Good Reasoning Matters, Third Edition (Oxford University Press, 2004), and co-editor of Argumentation and Its Applications (forthcoming CD-Rom) and two other CD-ROMs, Argumentation at the Century′s Turn and Argumentation and Rhetoric. Recent work of his has appeared in the following journals: Argumentation; Informal Logic; ProtoSociology; Social Theory and Practice. In addition to teaching at Trent University, in 2001-2002 he was a research fellow at the Centre for Interdisciplinary Research), Bielefeld, Germany. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |