Overview

Excerpt from Rex V. Russell: Report of the Trial of Sir Edward Russell, at the Liverpool Assizes for Criminal Libel in the Liverpool Daily Post and Mercury; Together With the Proceedings on the Application for a Rule Before the Divisional Court Mr. Asquith. - No, I think not. Similar passages occur in the other judgments of the Lords Justice. There is a later case the Farnham case, of the King v. Howard, in 1902 in the King's Bench Division. That is where the justices had gone and made an investigation on their own account to see whether or not there was a redundant supply of licences. The lord chief justice - These are licensing justices, not quarter sessions? Mr. Asquith. - They were exactly in the same position as this Committee here. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

Full Product Details

9781331090953

Table of Contents

Reviews

Author Information

Tab Content 6

Countries Available