Overview

Artificial intelligence has traversed a remarkable path from its inception as rule-based systems to the sophisticated neural architectures that dominate today's technological landscape. Early AI models operated within rigidly defined parameters, executing predefined instructions with mechanical precision but lacking the flexibility to handle ambiguity or novelty. The advent of machine learning introduced statistical methods that allowed systems to infer patterns from data, marking a shift toward more adaptive intelligence. Yet, it was the emergence of large language models (LLMs) in the late 2010s and early 2020s that truly revolutionized the field. Models such as GPT-3, BERT, and their successors demonstrated an unprecedented ability to generate human-like text, translate languages, summarize documents, and even engage in rudimentary reasoning. These LLMs, trained on vast corpora of internet-scale data, internalized patterns of language and knowledge to an extent that enabled them to respond to a wide array of queries with coherence and apparent understanding. Despite these achievements, traditional LLMs harbor intrinsic limitations that constrain their reliability in critical applications. Paramount among these is the issue of knowledge encapsulation. LLMs are pretrained on fixed datasets, often with cutoff dates that render their internal knowledge static and susceptible to obsolescence. Information postdating the training corpus-such as recent scientific discoveries, geopolitical events, or evolving market trends-remains inaccessible unless the model undergoes costly retraining. Moreover, even within the bounds of their training data, LLMs exhibit a propensity for hallucination, generating plausible but factually incorrect responses when confronted with gaps in their parametric memory. This phenomenon arises from the model's reliance on probabilistic pattern matching rather than verifiable retrieval of facts. In domains requiring precision, such as medicine, law, or finance, hallucinations pose unacceptable risks, eroding trust and utility. Compounding these challenges is the opacity of LLM decision-making. Responses emerge from billions of interconnected parameters, making it difficult to trace the provenance of a given output or to explain why a particular fact was recalled-or invented. This black-box nature hinders auditability, compliance with regulatory standards, and the iterative improvement of model behavior. Furthermore, LLMs struggle with long-tail knowledge: rare but important facts buried in niche documents or specialized corpora are often overshadowed by more frequent patterns in the training data, leading to incomplete or biased representations of reality.

Full Product Details

9798274313582

Table of Contents

Reviews

Author Information

Tab Content 6

Countries Available