Overview

The received wisdom in European integration history is that, long before the EU was plagued by Euroscepticism and other forms of contestation, there was a ""permissive consensus"" between European elites and the general public, which allowed European integration to move forward. This book looks beyond this presumed consensus, to ask how the members of European institutions themselves perceived and shaped their relations with European citizens during the early years of the European Communities. It does so from the perspective of the people who were responsible for representing citizens at the European level: the members of the European Parliament (which represented European citizens) and the Economic and Social Committee (which represented European organised interests). The book follows the first generation of these European representatives in building their institutions during the 1950s and 1960s. It shows that the European representatives sought to democratise the Communities, within the constraints of the legal and institutional framework that was created with the European treaties. In doing so, the book argues, they created new path dependencies and reaffirmed existing ones, but hardly challenged the status quo - characterised later with concepts like the permissive consensus and the democratic deficit. The book shows, then, that the European representatives' ambition to democratise the European Communities from within has shaped European integration in ways that are not fully appreciated and understood by historians and political scientists.

Full Product Details

9781788216081

Table of Contents

Reviews

This is a very welcome and highly accomplished study of two institutions neither of which has been looked at in anything like the depth that they deserve, namely the early European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee. As such it teaches much about the early evolution of today’s European Union. -- Piers Ludlow, Professor of International History, London School of Economics

This is a very welcome and highly accomplished study of two institutions neither of which has been looked at in anything like the depth that they deserve, namely the early European Parliament and the European Social Committee.  As such it teaches much about the early evolution of today’s European Union. -- Piers Ludlow, London School of Economics

Author Information

Koen van Zon is a postdoctoral researcher at Studio Europa Maastricht. He obtained his PhD from Radboud University Nijmegen and worked as a postdoctoral researcher at Utrecht University.

Tab Content 6

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

Countries Available