Overview

This monograph addresses a contested but under-discussed question in the field of criminal sentencing: should an offender's remorse affect the sentence he or she receives? Answering this question involves tackling a series of others: is it possible to justify mitigation for remorse within a retributive sentencing framework? Precisely how should remorse enter into the sentencing equation? How should the mitigating weight of remorse interact with other aggravating and mitigating factors? Are there some offence or offender characteristics that preclude remorse-based mitigation? Remorse is recognised as a legitimate mitigating factor in many sentencing regimes around the world, with powerful effects on sentence severity. Although there has been some discussion of whether this practice can be justified within the literature on sentencing and penal theory, this monograph provides the first comprehensive and in-depth study of possible theoretical justifications. Whilst the emphasis here is on theoretical justification, the monograph also offers analysis of how normative conclusions would play out in the broader context of sentencing decisions and the guidance intended to structure them. The conclusions reached have relevance for sentencing systems around the world.

Full Product Details

9781849465434

Table of Contents

Reviews

[R]etributive scholars will no doubt relish and debate Maslen's highly sophisticated contribution to theory [...]. -- Justice David P. Cole, Ontario Court of Justice Criminal Law Quarterly, 62

Endorsement retributive scholars will no doubt relish and debate Maslen's highly sophisticated contribution to theory -- David Cole, Ontario Court of Justice

Author Information

Hannah Maslen is a Research Fellow in Ethics at the Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, and a Junior Research Fellow at New College. She is also a James Martin Fellow at the Oxford Martin School.

Tab Content 6

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

Countries Available