|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewThis comparative analysis of the constitutional law of religion-state relations in the United States and Germany focuses on the principle of state neutrality. A strong emphasis on state neutrality, a notoriously ambiguous concept, is a shared feature in the constitutional jurisprudence of the US Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court, but neutrality does not have the same meaning in both systems. In Germany neutrality tends to indicate more distance between church and state, whereas the opposite is the case in the United States. Neutrality also has other meanings in both systems, making straightforward comparison more difficult than it might seem. Although the underlying trajectory of neutrality is different in both countries, the discussion of neutrality breaks down into largely parallel themes. By examining those themes in a comparative perspective, the meaning of state neutrality in religion-state relations can be delineated. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Claudia E. Haupt (George Washington University, Washington DC)Publisher: Cambridge University Press Imprint: Cambridge University Press (Virtual Publishing) ISBN: 9781139059527ISBN 10: 1139059521 Publication Date: 05 January 2012 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Undefined Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Available To Order ![]() We have confirmation that this item is in stock with the supplier. It will be ordered in for you and dispatched immediately. Table of ContentsReviewsAuthor InformationClaudia E. Haupt is the International and Comparative Law Fellow at George Washington University Law School, Washington, DC. She previously practised law in Cologne and taught US constitutional history as an adjunct in the department of Anglo-American History at the University of Cologne. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |