Reconceptualising European Equality Law: A Comparative Institutional Analysis

Author:   Johanna Croon-Gestefeld
Publisher:   Bloomsbury Publishing PLC
ISBN:  

9781509909667


Pages:   282
Publication Date:   23 February 2017
Format:   Hardback
Availability:   Manufactured on demand   Availability explained
We will order this item for you from a manufactured on demand supplier.

Our Price $170.00 Quantity:  
Add to Cart

Share |

Reconceptualising European Equality Law: A Comparative Institutional Analysis


Add your own review!

Overview

Full Product Details

Author:   Johanna Croon-Gestefeld
Publisher:   Bloomsbury Publishing PLC
Imprint:   Hart Publishing
Dimensions:   Width: 15.60cm , Height: 2.50cm , Length: 23.40cm
Weight:   0.556kg
ISBN:  

9781509909667


ISBN 10:   1509909664
Pages:   282
Publication Date:   23 February 2017
Audience:   College/higher education ,  Professional and scholarly ,  Tertiary & Higher Education ,  Professional & Vocational
Format:   Hardback
Publisher's Status:   Active
Availability:   Manufactured on demand   Availability explained
We will order this item for you from a manufactured on demand supplier.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction I. Equality: A Fundamental Principle Based on not so Stable Fundaments II. The Need for Reconceptualising Equality Law or the Rationalist Human Rights Paradigm III. EU Law as the Laboratory of Constitutional Theory IV. The Institutional Choice Approach to EU Equality Law 2. The Notion of Equality I. Why Equality? II. What Kind of Equality? III. The Relationship of Equality and Non-discrimination 3. Equality Testing: Different Kinds of Scrutiny I. Three Standards of Scrutiny II. Traditional Interpretive Explanation III. Changing Perspectives: A Comparative Institutional Explanation IV. Conclusion 4. Differential Treatment of EU Citizens I. Non-discrimination on Grounds of Nationality: A Leitmotiv of the TFEU II. Article 18(1) TFEU: A Relative Right to Equal Treatment III. Challenges to the Equal Treatment of EU Citizens IV. Equal Treatment of EU Citizens: An Institutional Choice Reconstruction V. Conclusion 5. Reverse Discrimination I. Reverse Discrimination: Its Definition, Egalitarian Tune and Relevance II. The European Court of Justice's Handling of Reverse Discrimination III. The Fundamental Boundaries Concern-or Institutional Choice in the Supranational Context 6. Affirmative Action for Women I. The European Union Jurisprudence II. The American Experience III. Translating the American Experience to the European Debate IV. Comparative Institutional Analysis of Affirmative Action 7. Conclusion I. Breaking down the Divides II. The Four Conceivable Relations between Equality Review and Institutional Choice III. More Coherence through Doctrinal Adaptation IV. Summary of the Thesis in Eight Points 1. Introduction I. Equality: A Fundamental Principle Based on not so Stable Fundaments II. The Need for Reconceptualising Equality Law or the Rationalist Human Rights Paradigm III. EU Law as the Laboratory of Constitutional Theory IV. The Institutional Choice Approach to EU Equality Law 2. The Notion of Equality I. Why Equality? II. What Kind of Equality? III. The Relationship of Equality and Non-discrimination 3. Equality Testing: Different Kinds of Scrutiny I. Three Standards of Scrutiny II. Traditional Interpretive Explanation III. Changing Perspectives: A Comparative Institutional Explanation IV. Conclusion 4. Differential Treatment of EU Citizens I. Non-discrimination on Grounds of Nationality: A Leitmotiv of the TFEU II. Article 18(1) TFEU: A Relative Right to Equal Treatment III. Challenges to the Equal Treatment of EU Citizens IV. Equal Treatment of EU Citizens: An Institutional Choice Reconstruction V. Conclusion 5. Reverse Discrimination I. Reverse Discrimination: Its Definition, Egalitarian Tune and Relevance II. The European Court of Justice's Handling of Reverse Discrimination III. The Fundamental Boundaries Concern-or Institutional Choice in the Supranational Context 6. Affirmative Action for Women I. The European Union Jurisprudence II. The American Experience III. Translating the American Experience to the European Debate IV. Comparative Institutional Analysis of Affirmative Action 7. Conclusion I. Breaking down the Divides II. The Four Conceivable Relations between Equality Review and Institutional Choice III. More Coherence through Doctrinal Adaptation IV. Summary of the Thesis in Eight Points 1. Introduction I. Equality: A Fundamental Principle Based on not so Stable Fundaments II. The Need for Reconceptualising Equality Law or the Rationalist Human Rights Paradigm III. EU Law as the Laboratory of Constitutional Theory IV. The Institutional Choice Approach to EU Equality Law 2. The Notion of Equality I. Why Equality? II. What Kind of Equality? III. The Relationship of Equality and Non-discrimination 3. Equality Testing: Different Kinds of Scrutiny I. Three Standards of Scrutiny II. Traditional Interpretive Explanation III. Changing Perspectives: A Comparative Institutional Explanation IV. Conclusion 4. Differential Treatment of EU Citizens I. Non-discrimination on Grounds of Nationality: A Leitmotiv of the TFEU II. Article 18(1) TFEU: A Relative Right to Equal Treatment III. Challenges to the Equal Treatment of EU Citizens IV. Equal Treatment of EU Citizens: An Institutional Choice Reconstruction V. Conclusion 5. Reverse Discrimination I. Reverse Discrimination: Its Definition, Egalitarian Tune and Relevance II. The European Court of Justice's Handling of Reverse Discrimination III. The Fundamental Boundaries Concern-or Institutional Choice in the Supranational Context 6. Affirmative Action for Women I. The European Union Jurisprudence II. The American Experience III. Translating the American Experience to the European Debate IV. Comparative Institutional Analysis of Affirmative Action 7. Conclusion I. Breaking down the Divides II. The Four Conceivable Relations between Equality Review and Institutional Choice III. More Coherence through Doctrinal Adaptation IV. Summary of the Thesis in Eight Points 1. Introduction I. Equality: A Fundamental Principle Based on not so Stable Fundaments II. The Need for Reconceptualising Equality Law or the Rationalist Human Rights Paradigm III. EU Law as the Laboratory of Constitutional Theory IV. The Institutional Choice Approach to EU Equality Law 2. The Notion of Equality I. Why Equality? II. What Kind of Equality? III. The Relationship of Equality and Non-discrimination 3. Equality Testing: Different Kinds of Scrutiny I. Three Standards of Scrutiny II. Traditional Interpretive Explanation III. Changing Perspectives: A Comparative Institutional Explanation IV. Conclusion 4. Differential Treatment of EU Citizens I. Non-discrimination on Grounds of Nationality: A Leitmotiv of the TFEU II. Article 18(1) TFEU: A Relative Right to Equal Treatment III. Challenges to the Equal Treatment of EU Citizens IV. Equal Treatment of EU Citizens: An Institutional Choice Reconstruction V. Conclusion 5. Reverse Discrimination I. Reverse Discrimination: Its Definition, Egalitarian Tune and Relevance II. The European Court of Justice's Handling of Reverse Discrimination III. The Fundamental Boundaries Concern-or Institutional Choice in the Supranational Context 6. Affirmative Action for Women I. The European Union Jurisprudence II. The American Experience III. Translating the American Experience to the European Debate IV. Comparative Institutional Analysis of Affirmative Action 7. Conclusion I. Breaking down the Divides II. The Four Conceivable Relations between Equality Review and Institutional Choice III. More Coherence through Doctrinal Adaptation IV. Summary of the Thesis in Eight Points

Reviews

Reconceptualising EU equality law is a great challenge. Johanna Croon-Gestefeld approaches it from an angle that, in practice, is often veiled and not fully understood by the public. By trying to make sense of the CJEU's equality adjudication and analysing it from a comparative-institutional point of view, she contributes to a better understanding of EU equality law. One of the strengths of this book is that she provides concrete tools and techniques for judges to carry out such a comparative institutional analysis (see, in particular, Chapter 7). This book can therefore be warmly recommended as a very worthwhile read. -- Elisabeth Brameshuber, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business * European Journal of Social Security *


Reconceptualising EU equality law is a great challenge. Johanna Croon-Gestefeld approaches it from an angle that, in practice, is often veiled and not fully understood by the public. By trying to make sense of the CJEU's equality adjudication and analysing it from a comparative-institutional point of view, she contributes to a better understanding of EU equality law. One of the strengths of this book is that she provides concrete tools and techniques for judges to carry out such a comparative institutional analysis (see, in particular, Chapter 7). This book can therefore be warmly recommended as a very worthwhile read. -- Elisabeth Brameshuber, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business * European Journal of Social Security * Croon-Gestefeld's reconceptualization of EU equality law revisits the subject matter in a provoking and fascinating way, trying to lift the mystery surrounding the ECJ's deliberations, and thus contributing to a better understanding and awareness of the complexity characterizing that set of rules and its enforcement. Practitioners and researchers interested in EU equality law will therefore find the book particularly interesting and useful. -- Federico Casolari * Common Market Law Review *


Author Information

Johanna Croon-Gestefeld is Postdoctoral Fellow at Bucerius Law School.

Tab Content 6

Author Website:  

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

No review item found!

Add your own review!

Countries Available

All regions
Latest Reading Guide

MRG2025CC

 

Shopping Cart
Your cart is empty
Shopping cart
Mailing List