|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewA number of commentators assert that the military response to the terrorist atrocities of 11 September 2001 - encompassing attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq, and commonly referred to as the 'war on terror' - has significantly impacted upon the international law regulating resort to armed force by states (jus ad bellum), loosening the constraints on self-defence. Some even suggest that the very future of the United Nations, in particular the Security Council and its collective security system, is at risk - at least in its current form. This book does not address the question of the future of the United Nations, an issue probably best left to scholars of international relations. Instead, it seeks to place the 'war on terror' within the context of international law, assessing how, or whether, it can be accommodated within the existing legal framework limiting the use of force. Through an examination of the lawfulness (or otherwise) of both Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom, including the legal justifications advanced by those states involved and the reaction of the international community, and involving a detailed discussion of the most important developments (ie, the permissibility of self-defence against non-state, terrorist, actors and the 'Bush doctrine' of pre-emptive self-defence against terrorists as proclaimed in the 2002 US National Security Strategy) the book determines whether, and to what extent, the right to use force - or the acceptability of such military action - is currently undergoing a radical transformation. By assessing subsequent developments illustrating the impact that military action against Afghanistan and Iraq has had on the jus ad bellum, this book represents a distinctive and original contribution to the academic literature. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Lindsay MoirPublisher: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC Imprint: Hart Publishing Volume: 27 Dimensions: Width: 15.60cm , Height: 1.50cm , Length: 23.40cm Weight: 0.439kg ISBN: 9781841136097ISBN 10: 1841136093 Pages: 192 Publication Date: 20 January 2010 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Manufactured on demand ![]() We will order this item for you from a manufactured on demand supplier. Table of ContentsIntroduction 1: General Legal Framework 1945-2001: The UN Charter Paradigm and the Jus ad Bellum I. The Prohibition of the Use of Force II. The Use of Force in Self-Defence A. Anticipatory Self-Defence B. The Definition of 'Armed Attack' and Self-Defence against Non-State Actors III. Security Council Authorisation 2: Military Action Against Afghanistan, 2001: Operation Enduring Freedom I. Was there an Armed Attack on the United States? II. Was the Response Necessary? A. Was the Attack Over? B. Was the State of Afghanistan a Legitimate Target? III. Was the Response Proportionate? 3: Military Action Against Iraq, 2003: Operation Iraqi Freedom I. Was the Action Taken in Self-Defence? II. Was the Action Authorised by the Security Council? A. Was Military Action Authorised by Resolution 1441? B. Was Military Action Authorised as a Lawful Response to the Violation of the Ceasefire Agreement? 4: Reappraising the Resort to Force? Jus ad Bellum in the Post-9/11 World I. International Court of Justice Jurisprudence A. The Oil Platforms Case B. The Palestinian Wall Advisory Opinion C. The Armed Activities Case II. State Practice A. Israeli Military Operations in Lebanon and Syria B. Russian Military Operations in Georgia C. Ethiopian Military Operations in Somalia III. A ReappraisalReviewsThe author employs a writing style that makes the book an enjoyable read without sacrificing depth of analysis. The book is a significant contribution to the emerging debate as to the lasting impact of the USA's actions over the past decade and is a worthwhile read for anyone interested in this area. Christian Henderson Journal of Conflict and Security Law 2010 Although the book is slim weighing in at only 156 pages it provides a well written and, for the most part, comprehensive engagement with relevant academic texts, ICJ decisions, and state practice.Reappraising the Resort to Force is an engaging, well written, and succinct evaluation of the jus ad bellum on the morning of September 11, 2001, as deployed in the debates over the military action in Afghanistan (2001) and Iraq (2003), and in the years since these operations. It represents a valuable contribution to the research on the impact of the war on terror on the rules and norms of international law.Andrew SangerDemocracy and SecurityVolume 8, 2012The book employs a variety of sophisticated, well-organized sources including: jurisprudence; United Nations resolutions and declarations; government legislation, memos, and declarations; as well as opinions and commentary from various scholars in the field of international law. The work is divided into clear and cogent sections, beginning with a historical overview of the use of force in twentieth century international law...the book is a welcome read for anyone wanting to learn or brush up on the basics of jus ad bellum in the modern era [and] provides a concise and contemporary explication of the use of force doctrine...Moir's incisive exegesis of the development of jus ad bellum has much to provide for both scholars and novices alike. The book delivers a useful historical analysis of the jus ad bellum doctrine, an overview of the debate regarding the current formulation of the use of force, and the author's call for caution before declaring jus ad bellum irrevocably altered by the war on terror. Although his ultimate thesis is perhaps tenuous, the overall depth, clarity, and readability of the work recommend it for anyone interested in international law, the use of state force, or the recent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.Jared BidenSaskatchewan Law ReviewVolume 75, 2012...there is no surer guide to this intricate topic than Lindday Moir's new book on the use of force in international law (jus ad bellum). It is a deceptively short work, running to only 160 pages of text. Yet within this space, Moir manages to address everything one would care to know about this contentious subject, each section weaving its way expertly through the multitude of sources clustered in the footnotes.Robert WhitehouseThe Law Society GazetteAugust 2011The author employs a writing style that makes the book an enjoyable read without sacrificing depth of analysis.The book is a significant contribution to the emerging debate as to the lasting impact of the USA's actions over the past decade and is a worthwhile read for anyone interested in this area.Christian HendersonJournal of Conflict and Security Law2010 Author InformationLindsay Moir is Professor of International Law at Hull University. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |