|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
Awards
OverviewFull Product DetailsAuthor: David French (Professor of History, Professor of History, University College London)Publisher: Oxford University Press Imprint: Oxford University Press Dimensions: Width: 15.60cm , Height: 1.80cm , Length: 23.50cm Weight: 0.515kg ISBN: 9780199246304ISBN 10: 0199246300 Pages: 332 Publication Date: 05 July 2001 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Paperback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: To order ![]() Stock availability from the supplier is unknown. We will order it for you and ship this item to you once it is received by us. Table of ContentsIntroduction 1: 'How Are You to Succeed without Causing Losses?': Doctrine and Organization, 1919-1939 2: Regimental Officers and the Rank and File 3: Weapons and Equipment 4: Discipline and Morale 5: The Pre-War Army and the British Expeditionary Force 6: The Reformation of the Army, Home Forces, 1940-1943 7: The Desert War, 1940-1942 8: Monty's Army: Alam Halfa to the Rhine Conclusion BibliographyReviewsarresting new study ... a bold book - the boldness of its conception too easily taken for granted - as stimulating and discriminating as anything in the field since the iconoclastic Firepower: British Army Weapons and Theories of War 1904-1945 (1982) by Shelford Bidwell and Dominick Graham ... His work is a comprehensive exercise in ground-clearing, and a searching assessment of each element of fighting power ... It is a noble calling, and it makes a convincing book. Alex Danchev, Times Literary Supplement French succeeds admirably in modifying the judgement of those who have contrasted the British army's performance unfavourably with that of the Germans. As he remarks, 'the British had never believed that they could win their battles by pitting man against man, and indeed they never believed that they should even try to do so'. In the end, it was better to be soldiers than warriors.' Reviews in History masterful and fascinating book ... not just a military history but a carefully woven account of the political, economic, social, and personal elements that illustrate the way that an army is equipped and led, and how and why it fights. I.M. Roth, CHOICE, Jan 2001. French's study is based on an exhaustive examination of previously unused primary material, and as such it will stand as the definitive work on the structure of the British Army between 1919 and 1945 ... it will win a devoted following from specialists in the history of World War II. John P. Rossi, History, Summer 2000. David French's book makes compelling reading for any serious student of the Second World War ... this book makes a key contribution to the debate about how the British fought the Second World War, and why the Allies took so long to win it. Evening Standard `French succeeds admirably in modifying the judgement of those who have contrasted the British army's performance unfavourably with that of the Germans. As he remarks, 'the British had never believed that they could win their battles by pitting man against man, and indeed they never believed that they should even try to do so'. In the end, it was better to be soldiers than warriors.'' Reviews in History `As French weaves together his argument, he provides many useful bits of information about the British Army. The writing atyle is such that non-specialists will ahve little trouble following French's argument. It is a formidable study of the British Army before and during the Secon World War.' Dr. Matthews Hughes, University College Northampton, RUSI `French's study is based on an exhaustive examination of previously unused primary material, and as such it will stand as the definitive work on the structure of the British Army between 1919 and 1945 ... it will win a devoted following from specialists in the history of World War II.' John P. Rossi, History, Summer 2000. `masterful and fascinating book ... not just a military history but a carefully woven account of the political, economic, social, and personal elements that illustrate the way that an army is equipped and led, and how and why it fights.' I.M. Roth, CHOICE, Jan 2001. `His book deserves a wider audience than its title suggests. Highly recommended.' I.M. Roth, CHOICE, Jan 2001. `this formidable study ... lucid introduction ... The writing style is such that non-specialists will have little trouble following French's argument.' Dr Matthew Hughes, R U S I Jnl, Dec. 2000. `this book ... is essential for anyone seriously interested in the British Army and modern military history.' Dr Matthew Hughes, R U S I Jnl, Dec. 2000. `this book makes a key contribution to the debate about how the British fought the Second World War, and why the Allies took so long to win it.' Max Hastings, Yorkshire Post, 6th July 2000. `David French's book makes compelling reading for any serious student of the Second World War.' Max Hastings, Yorkshire Post, 6th July 2000. `David French's book makes compelling reading for any serious student of the Second World War...this book makes a key contribution to the debate about how the British fought the Second World War, and why the Allies took so long to win it.' Evening Standard arresting new study ... a bold book - the boldness of its conception too easily taken for granted - as stimulating and discriminating as anything in the field since the iconoclastic Firepower: British Army Weapons and Theories of War 1904-1945 (1982) by Shelford Bidwell and Dominick Graham ... His work is a comprehensive exercise in ground-clearing, and a searching assessment of each element of fighting power ... It is a noble calling, and it makes a convincing book. Alex Danchev, Times Literary Supplement French succeeds admirably in modifying the judgement of those who have contrasted the British army's performance unfavourably with that of the Germans. As he remarks, 'the British had never believed that they could win their battles by pitting man against man, and indeed they never believed that they should even try to do so'. In the end, it was better to be soldiers than warriors.' Reviews in History masterful and fascinating book ... not just a military history but a carefully woven account of the political, economic, social, and personal elements that illustrate the way that an army is equipped and led, and how and why it fights. I.M. Roth, CHOICE, Jan 2001. French's study is based on an exhaustive examination of previously unused primary material, and as such it will stand as the definitive work on the structure of the British Army between 1919 and 1945 ... it will win a devoted following from specialists in the history of World War II. John P. Rossi, History, Summer 2000. David French's book makes compelling reading for any serious student of the Second World War ... this book makes a key contribution to the debate about how the British fought the Second World War, and why the Allies took so long to win it. Evening Standard Author InformationTab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |