Overview

This book is a study of cold war agenda setting in relation to the Julius and Ethel Rosenberg spy case. Its primary interest is with press coverage of the case from 1950 to 1953, although the historical focus of the case extends before and beyond those years. The purpose of the book is not to debate the Rosenbergs' guilt or innocence, but rather to provide a fresh view of the case in its most political terms: news coverage filtered through the dynamics of cold war patriotism. A large sample of U.S. and foreign newspapers and magazines was monitored to determine if the Rosenbergs were victims of sensational pretrial and during-trial newspaper publicity. Neville also determines if the press reported on the claims of a U.S. left-wing newspaper, the National Guardian, that the Rosenbergs were framed by the U.S. government with the complicity of the news media. His conclusions question whether the mainstream press and news media ignore issues of justice for radicals in time of war and political crisis.

Full Product Details

9780275949952

Table of Contents

Reviews

"?Neville has added to knowledge of the Rosenberg case by focusing on the role of the mainstream press in its coverage of both their trial and their appeal for a stay of execution. He argues that news coverage of this major espionage trial was filtered through information provided by the government. Upper-division undergraduates and above.?-Choice ?The book escapsulates the myriad details of the complex case withput losing its focus...This is a solid addition to the literature and deserves a wide readership.?-Journalism History ""The book escapsulates the myriad details of the complex case withput losing its focus...This is a solid addition to the literature and deserves a wide readership.""-Journalism History ""Neville has added to knowledge of the Rosenberg case by focusing on the role of the mainstream press in its coverage of both their trial and their appeal for a stay of execution. He argues that news coverage of this major espionage trial was filtered through information provided by the government. Upper-division undergraduates and above.""-Choice"

?Neville has added to knowledge of the Rosenberg case by focusing on the role of the mainstream press in its coverage of both their trial and their appeal for a stay of execution. He argues that news coverage of this major espionage trial was filtered through information provided by the government. Upper-division undergraduates and above.?-Choice

Neville has added to knowledge of the Rosenberg case by focusing on the role of the mainstream press in its coverage of both their trial and their appeal for a stay of execution. He argues that news coverage of this major espionage trial was filtered through information provided by the government. Upper-division undergraduates and above. -Choice The book escapsulates the myriad details of the complex case withput losing its focus...This is a solid addition to the literature and deserves a wide readership. -Journalism History ?The book escapsulates the myriad details of the complex case withput losing its focus...This is a solid addition to the literature and deserves a wide readership.?-Journalism History ?Neville has added to knowledge of the Rosenberg case by focusing on the role of the mainstream press in its coverage of both their trial and their appeal for a stay of execution. He argues that news coverage of this major espionage trial was filtered through information provided by the government. Upper-division undergraduates and above.?-Choice

Author Information

JOHN F. NEVILLE holds a Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota. He has also worked as a regional freelance newspaper and magazine reporter and as a public relations writer.

Tab Content 6

Countries Available