Overview

A major history of the evolution of political journalism in the late Stuart and early Hanoverian period. The reign of Queen Anne (1702-1714) saw a remarkable boom in political journalism and newspaper culture in London, in which some of the leading literary lights of the age, Swift, Defoe, Addison, Steele, were heavily involved. While scholars have dealt at length with the physical development and circulation of these newspapers and with their literary contribution, much less has been done to trace the evolving ideologies of London's political newspapers in this period. In this major contribution to the study of eighteenth-century political culture, Ashley Marshall shows how the ideologies of the leading papers evolved in direct and indirect response to one another. She offers provocative re-readings of well-known journals, including Defoe's Review, Swift's Examiner and the various publishing ventures of Richard Steele, and first accounts of the wealth of smaller, short-lived journals which made up the ecosystem of periodical publishing at the time. A ground-breaking final chapter looks at the radically different ways in which periodical writers imagined and addressed their public. Drawing out the distinction between the Whig ideal of a highly engaged citizenry and a Tory press which conditioned its readers to be dutiful subjects rather than active citizens, Marshall argues that these rhetorical differences reflected an ongoing debate about the ultimate role of journalism.

Full Product Details

9781837651290

Table of Contents

Reviews

There is no question that Marshall's monograph finds itself affixed to an extensive historiographical lineage, with academic interest in early eighteenth-century British publishing going back decades. But due to its distinctive breadth of content, its novel approach to examining the broader influence of the relevant news writers, and its immensely accommodating bibliography, Political Journalism in London should receive consideration as the new standard-bearer of the field. -- H-NET REVIEWS This book is both an excellent overview of the existing scholarship and an original contribution to knowledge of early political journalism. It shows Marshall's trademark erudition and attention to nuance and complexity, and it is written clearly enough to appeal to nonspecialists. Essential. * CHOICE * In her discussions of major authors (Swift, Defoe, and Steele), Marshall introduces a wealth of scholarship and endeavors to build upon and then thread between others' positions. * EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY INTELLIGENCER *

There is no question that Marshall's monograph finds itself affixed to an extensive historiographical lineage, with academic interest in early eighteenth-century British publishing going back decades. But due to its distinctive breadth of content, its novel approach to examining the broader influence of the relevant news writers, and its immensely accommodating bibliography, Political Journalism in London should receive consideration as the new standard-bearer of the field. -- H-NET REVIEWS This book is both an excellent overview of the existing scholarship and an original contribution to knowledge of early political journalism. It shows Marshall's trademark erudition and attention to nuance and complexity, and it is written clearly enough to appeal to nonspecialists. Essential. * CHOICE * In her discussions of major authors (Swift, Defoe, and Steele), Marshall introduces a wealth of scholarship and endeavors to build upon and then thread between others' positions. * EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY INTELLIGENCER * With this monograph, Marshall makes a substantial and even provocative contribution to the study of political journalism in London during a key time of transition in British history. * JOURNAL OF BRITISH STUDIES *

Author Information

Ashley Marshall is Professor and Chair of English at the University of Nevada, Reno.

Tab Content 6

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

Countries Available