|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewThis book provides a comprehensive account of the imprisonment of women for politically motivated offences in Northern Ireland between 1972 and 1999. Women political prisoners were engaged in a campaign to obtain formal recognition as political prisoners, and then to retain this status after it was revoked. Their lengthy involvement in a prison conflict of international significance was notable as much because of its longevity as the radical aspects of their prison protests, which included hunger strikes, dirty-protests and campaigns against institutional abuses. Out of Order brings out the qualitatively distinctive character and punitive ethos of regimes of political imprisonment for women, exploring the dynamics of their internal organisation, the ways in which they subverted order and security in prison, and their strategies of resistance and exploitation. Drawing upon a wide range of first hand accounts and interviews this book brings together perspectives from the areas of political imprisonment, the penal punishment of women and the question of agency and resistance in prison to create a unique, highly readable study of a neglected subject. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Mary Corcoran (Keele University)Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd Imprint: Willan Publishing Edition: illustrated edition Weight: 0.530kg ISBN: 9781843921622ISBN 10: 1843921626 Pages: 288 Publication Date: 01 February 2006 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Paperback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: In Print ![]() This item will be ordered in for you from one of our suppliers. Upon receipt, we will promptly dispatch it out to you. For in store availability, please contact us. Table of ContentsReviewsMary CorcoranaaC--(t)s Out of Order: the Political Imprisonment of Women in Northern Ireland 1972-1998, provides a significant and valuable contribution to the currently limited academic analyses on womenaaC--(t)s political imprisonment in Northern Ireland. There remains a dearth of research on this minoritized population of women despite the fact that a wealth of research on the political imprisonment of men in Northern Ireland has been conducted (McEvoy, 2001; McKeown, 2001). In fact, while protests by men prisoners in the H-Block during the 1970aaC--(t)s and 1980aaC--(t)s are well documented, CorcoranaaC--(t)s analysis presents the first detailed documentation of protests by women prisoneraaC--(t)s in Armagh Prison and in the Mourne House Unit of Maghaberry Prison during the period of time well known as aaC--the troublesaaC--(t). Corcoran traces a history of the present, by charting the evolution of the punishment of female political prisoners in Northern Ireland over a 26-year period. To do this, she structures her account according to the three key stages of prison administration and penal regimes that she identified as operating in Armagh Prison during this time frame: reactive containment (1969-76), criminalization (1976-1981), and normalization (1982-1998). During the criminalization period, the women resisted the removal of their political status in prison by engaging in a aaC--dirty protestaaC--(t) (refusing to bathe, smearing their cells with feces and menstrual blood). In addition, and despite the Provisional IRA orders against it, the women participated in a nearly year long hunger strike, both to resist and demonstrate their agency as political prisoners and to show their solidarity with and support of their male counterparts in H-Block. Unique to this analysis, is that the author exposes how the womenaaC--(t)s acts were demonstrative not only of their resistance to the removal of their political status, but also to the gendered mistreatment they experienced as women prisoners.During the later years of the normalization phase of prison administration, women political prisoners in Armagh Prison adopted a neo-liberalistic approach to resistance, by employing formal legal litigation against the administration due to discrimination they experienced with respect to their prison conditions, rights, and the campaigned use of strip-searching. Despite engaging with the reigning entrepreneurial and neo-liberal governing strategy that continues to dominate the correctional landscape, resisting the structure and control of the prison through legal means was negatively reconstructed by prison officials as a mere tactic used to cause disruption in the prison. Women political prisoners were reconstructed in mangerialistic terms, not as self-governing agents or unsatisfied clients of a correctional service, but as aaC--oeopportunistic litigants and political agitatorsaaC-- whose legal demands were no more than selfish requests for a minority population of violent women prisoners (p.207). In this text, the author provides a well-balanced and nuanced analysis of the strategies employed by the women in their struggles to resist, demonstrate agency, as well as their relationships with prison authorities and staff. By highlighting the dual purpose and nature of the womenaaC--(t)s acts of resistance, and drawing heavily on the theoretical propositions of feminist criminologists Kelly Hannah-Moffat, Pat Carlen, and Mary Bosworth, Corcoran demonstrates that the womenaaC--(t)s narratives of resistance alternate between their roles as penal subjects and resisting agents, as dangerous women and women in danger, as survivors, and ultimately as agents attempting to secure collective prison transformation (p.222). While CorcoranaaC--(t)s analysis significantly adds to the broader theoretical framework of governance literature, her text may not be accessible to the very women she is writing about. Out of Order is dense with theory, to the benefit of academic penologists, yet at times the voices of the women who fought so hard to be heard are missing. Despite this, CorcoranaaC--(t)s text provides a sensitive and thoughtful discussion of the impact of gender on the resistance and status of political prisoners during aaC--the troublesaaC--(t). JENNIFER M. KILTY - Simon Fraser University References: McEvoy, K. (2001). Paramilitary imprisonment in Northern Ireland: Resistance, management, and release. Oxford: Oxford University Press. McKeown, L. (2001). Out of time: Irish Republican prisoners, Long Kesh, 1972-2000. Belfast: Beyond the Pale Press. Mary Corcorana (TM)s Out of Order: the Political Imprisonment of Women in Northern Ireland 1972-1998, provides a significant and valuable contribution to the currently limited academic analyses on womena (TM)s political imprisonment in Northern Ireland. There remains a dearth of research on this minoritized population of women despite the fact that a wealth of research on the political imprisonment of men in Northern Ireland has been conducted (McEvoy, 2001; McKeown, 2001). In fact, while protests by men prisoners in the H-Block during the 1970a (TM)s and 1980a (TM)s are well documented, Corcorana (TM)s analysis presents the first detailed documentation of protests by women prisonera (TM)s in Armagh Prison and in the Mourne House Unit of Maghaberry Prison during the period of time well known as a the troublesa (TM). Corcoran traces a history of the present, by charting the evolution of the punishment of female political prisoners in Northern Ireland over a 26-year period. To do this, she structures her account according to the three key stages of prison administration and penal regimes that she identified as operating in Armagh Prison during this time frame: reactive containment (1969-76), criminalization (1976-1981), and normalization (1982-1998). During the criminalization period, the women resisted the removal of their political status in prison by engaging in a a dirty protesta (TM) (refusing to bathe, smearing their cells with feces and menstrual blood). In addition, and despite the Provisional IRA orders against it, the women participated in a nearly year long hunger strike, both to resist and demonstrate their agency as political prisoners and to show their solidarity with and support of their male counterparts in H-Block. Unique to this analysis, is that the author exposes how the womena (TM)s acts were demonstrative not only of their resistance to the removal of their political status, but also to the gendered mistreatment they experienced as women prisoners.During the later years of the normalization phase of prison administration, women political prisoners in Armagh Prison adopted a neo-liberalistic approach to resistance, by employing formal legal litigation against the administration due to discrimination they experienced with respect to their prison conditions, rights, and the campaigned use of strip-searching. Despite engaging with the reigning entrepreneurial and neo-liberal governing strategy that continues to dominate the correctional landscape, resisting the structure and control of the prison through legal means was negatively reconstructed by prison officials as a mere tactic used to cause disruption in the prison. Women political prisoners were reconstructed in mangerialistic terms, not as self-governing agents or unsatisfied clients of a correctional service, but as a /opportunistic litigants and political agitatorsa whose legal demands were no more than selfish requests for a minority population of violent women prisoners (p.207). In this text, the author provides a well-balanced and nuanced analysis of the strategies employed by the women in their struggles to resist, demonstrate agency, as well as their relationships with prison authorities and staff. By highlighting the dual purpose and nature of the womena (TM)s acts of resistance, and drawing heavily on the theoretical propositions of feminist criminologists Kelly Hannah-Moffat, Pat Carlen, and Mary Bosworth, Corcoran demonstrates that the womena (TM)s narratives of resistance alternate between their roles as penal subjects and resisting agents, as dangerous women and women in danger, as survivors, and ultimately as agents attempting to secure collective prison transformation (p.222). While Corcorana (TM)s analysis significantly adds to the broader theoretical framework of governance literature, her text may not be accessible to the very women she is writing about. Out of Order is dense with theory, to the benefit of academic penologists, yet at times the voices of the women who fought so hard to be heard are missing. Despite this, Corcorana (TM)s text provides a sensitive and thoughtful discussion of the impact of gender on the resistance and status of political prisoners during a the troublesa (TM). JENNIFER M. KILTY - Simon Fraser University References: McEvoy, K. (2001). Paramilitary imprisonment in Northern Ireland: Resistance, management, and release. Oxford: Oxford University Press. McKeown, L. (2001). Out of time: Irish Republican prisoners, Long Kesh, 1972-2000. Belfast: Beyond the Pale Press. Mary CorcoranaaC--a s Out of Order: the Political Imprisonment of Women in Northern Ireland 1972-1998, provides a significant and valuable contribution to the currently limited academic analyses on womenaaC--a s political imprisonment in Northern Ireland. There remains a dearth of research on this minoritized population of women despite the fact that a wealth of research on the political imprisonment of men in Northern Ireland has been conducted (McEvoy, 2001; McKeown, 2001). In fact, while protests by men prisoners in the H-Block during the 1970aaC--a s and 1980aaC--a s are well documented, CorcoranaaC--a s analysis presents the first detailed documentation of protests by women prisoneraaC--a s in Armagh Prison and in the Mourne House Unit of Maghaberry Prison during the period of time well known as aaC--Euthe troublesaaC--a . Corcoran traces a history of the present, by charting the evolution of the punishment of female political prisoners in Northern Ireland over a 26-year period. To do this, she structures her account according to the three key stages of prison administration and penal regimes that she identified as operating in Armagh Prison during this time frame: reactive containment (1969-76), criminalization (1976-1981), and normalization (1982-1998). During the criminalization period, the women resisted the removal of their political status in prison by engaging in a aaC--Eudirty protestaaC--a (refusing to bathe, smearing their cells with feces and menstrual blood). In addition, and despite the Provisional IRA orders against it, the women participated in a nearly year long hunger strike, both to resist and demonstrate their agency as political prisoners and to show their solidarity with and support of their male counterparts in H-Block. Unique to this analysis, is that the author exposes how the womenaaC--a s acts were demonstrative not only of their resistance to the removal of their political status, but also to the gendered mistreatment they experienced as women prisoners.During the later years of the normalization phase of prison administration, women political prisoners in Armagh Prison adopted a neo-liberalistic approach to resistance, by employing formal legal litigation against the administration due to discrimination they experienced with respect to their prison conditions, rights, and the campaigned use of strip-searching. Despite engaging with the reigning entrepreneurial and neo-liberal governing strategy that continues to dominate the correctional landscape, resisting the structure and control of the prison through legal means was negatively reconstructed by prison officials as a mere tactic used to cause disruption in the prison. Women political prisoners were reconstructed in mangerialistic terms, not as self-governing agents or unsatisfied clients of a correctional service, but as aaC--A opportunistic litigants and political agitatorsaaC--Au whose legal demands were no more than selfish requests for a minority population of violent women prisoners (p.207). In this text, the author provides a well-balanced and nuanced analysis of the strategies employed by the women in their struggles to resist, demonstrate agency, as well as their relationships with prison authorities and staff. By highlighting the dual purpose and nature of the womenaaC--a s acts of resistance, and drawing heavily on the theoretical propositions of feminist criminologists Kelly Hannah-Moffat, Pat Carlen, and Mary Bosworth, Corcoran demonstrates that the womenaaC--a s narratives of resistance alternate between their roles as penal subjects and resisting agents, as dangerous women and women in danger, as survivors, and ultimately as agents attempting to secure collective prison transformation (p.222). While CorcoranaaC--a s analysis significantly adds to the broader theoretical framework of governance literature, her text may not be accessible to the very women she is writing about. Out of Order is dense with theory, to the benefit of academic penologists, yet at times the voices of the women who fought so hard to be heard are missing. Despite this, CorcoranaaC--a s text provides a sensitive and thoughtful discussion of the impact of gender on the resistance and status of political prisoners during aaC--Euthe troublesaaC--a . JENNIFER M. KILTY - Simon Fraser University References: McEvoy, K. (2001). Paramilitary imprisonment in Northern Ireland: Resistance, management, and release. Oxford: Oxford University Press. McKeown, L. (2001). Out of time: Irish Republican prisoners, Long Kesh, 1972-2000. Belfast: Beyond the Pale Press. Author Information"Mary Corcoran is a Lecturer in Criminology at Keele University. Some of her recent publications include: 'Normalization and its discontents - Constructing the 'irreconcilable' female political prisoner in northern Ireland'. British Journal of Criminology, vol. 47(3), 405-422 (2007); '""Talking about resistance"": women political prisoners and the dynamics of prison conflict, Northern Ireland' in Expanding the Criminological Imagination: Critical Readings in Criminology, Barton A, Corteen K, Scott D, Whyte D eds (Willan, 2006)." Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |