|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewDespite over two hundred years of experience with constitutional government, much remains unclear about the power of the political branches to curtail or re-define the judicial power of the United States. Uncertainty persists about the basis on which state courts and federal agencies may hear federal claims and the degree to which federal courts must review their decisions. Scholars approach these questions from a range of vantage points and have arrived at widely varying conclusions about the relationship between congressional and judicial power. Deploying familiar forms of legal analysis, and relying upon a new account of the Court's supremacy in relation to lower courts and tribunals, James Pfander advances a departmental conception of the judiciary. He argues that Congress can enlist the state courts, lower federal courts, and administrative agencies to hear federal claims in the first instance, but all of these tribunals must operate within a hierarchical framework over which the ""one supreme Court"" identified in the Constitution exercises ultimate supervisory authority. In offering the first general account of the Court as department head, Pfander takes up such important debates in the federal courts' literature as Congress's power to strip the federal courts of jurisdiction to review state court decisions, its authority to assign decision-making authority to state courts and non-Article III tribunals, its control over the doctrine of vertical stare decisis, and its ability to craft rules of practice for the federal system. Full Product DetailsAuthor: James E PfanderPublisher: Oxford University Press Inc Imprint: Oxford University Press Inc Dimensions: Width: 23.60cm , Height: 3.10cm , Length: 15.50cm Weight: 0.615kg ISBN: 9780195340334ISBN 10: 0195340337 Pages: 328 Publication Date: 04 June 2009 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Out of Stock Indefinitely Availability: Out of stock ![]() Table of ContentsReviews<br> Pfander's book provides an illuminating and well-written view on some core questions that have troubled scholars through the ages. - Aziz Huq, History News Network<p><br> <br> Pfander's book provides an illuminating and well-written view on some core questions that have troubled scholars through the ages. - Aziz Huq, History News Network<br> Pfander's book provides an illuminating and well-written view on some core questions that have troubled scholars through the ages. - Aziz Huq, History News Network Author InformationJames Pfander is a Professor of Law at Northwestern University School of Law. Since 1998, Professor Pfander has served as a consultant to the Federal-State Jurisdiction Committee of the Judicial Conference of the United States, in which capacity he considers the impact of proposed legislation on the jurisdiction of the federal courts. A member of the American Law Institute, he has chaired both the Federal Courts and Civil Procedure Sections of the Association of American Law Schools. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |