|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewFull Product DetailsAuthor: Douglas B. Rasmussen , Douglas J. Den UylPublisher: Pennsylvania State University Press Imprint: Pennsylvania State University Press Dimensions: Width: 15.60cm , Height: 2.10cm , Length: 23.40cm Weight: 0.653kg ISBN: 9780271027005ISBN 10: 0271027002 Pages: 464 Publication Date: 06 September 2005 Audience: College/higher education , Professional and scholarly , Undergraduate , Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Out of Print Availability: Out of stock ![]() Table of ContentsContents Preface Part I: Liberalism and the Political Order 1. Liberalism in Crisis 2. Liberalism and Ethics 3. Liberalism’s Past and Precedents 4. Why Individual Rights? Rights as Metanormative Principles 5. The Natural Right to Private Property Part II: A New Deep Structure for Liberalism 6. Individualistic Perfectionism 7. Defending Individualistic Perfectionism 8. Natural Law and the Common Good 9. Self-Ownership Part III: Defending Liberalism 10. Communitarian and Conservative Critics 11. The Structure of the Argument for Individual Rights 12. Defending Individualistic Non-Perfectionist Politics Epilogue IndexReviews""Norms of Liberty is one of the most important works on liberalism in recent years. The fact that individuals have different views of the good life poses a fundamental dilemma for modern political philosophy. Liberals frequently adopt a stance of moral neutrality, suggestive of relativism, subjectivism, or skepticism, while their opponents advocate a substantive moral view at the expense of individual freedom. Rasmussen and Den Uyl present a brilliant solution by distinguishing between normative principles guiding individual moral conduct and metanormative principles that concern legislation. They argue compellingly that neo-Aristotelian perfectionist ethics can support liberal non-perfectionist politics."" - Fred D. Miller Jr., Social Philosophy and Policy Center, Bowling Green State University Norms of Liberty is one of the most important works on liberalism in recent years. The fact that individuals have different views of the good life poses a fundamental dilemma for modern political philosophy. Liberals frequently adopt a stance of moral neutrality, suggestive of relativism, subjectivism, or skepticism, while their opponents advocate a substantive moral view at the expense of individual freedom. Rasmussen and Den Uyl present a brilliant solution by distinguishing between normative principles guiding individual moral conduct and metanormative principles that concern legislation. They argue compellingly that neo-Aristotelian perfectionist ethics can support liberal non-perfectionist politics. - Fred D. Miller Jr., Social Philosophy and Policy Center, Bowling Green State University Author InformationDouglas B. Rasmussen is Professor of Philosophy at St. John's University in New York City. Douglas J. Den Uyl is Vice President of Educational Programs at Liberty Fund in Indianapolis. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |