Overview

The attack began at 02:17 GMT. The lawyers were already awake. On 5 February 2026, the United States Navy fires Tomahawk and JASSM-ER cruise missiles at five targets on Iranian territory. No Security Council resolution. No coalition mandate. A joint statement of support issued one hour after the first missiles crossed Iranian airspace - and a claim of anticipatory self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter. By 05:43, Dr. Cornelis 'Frost' van Houte is standing at his window in Murmansk, looking at a painting he cannot finish, holding a phone he already knows he will answer. No Moment for Deliberation is a legal thriller built on a factual architecture. The international law it engages - the Newport Manual on the Law of Naval Warfare, the United Nations Charter, the Caroline doctrine, the Statute of the International Court of Justice - is real. Every citation can be verified. Every argument has been constructed as a competent practitioner would construct it. The question at the center of the case is not complicated. The Caroline standard requires that anticipatory self-defense be invoked only when necessity is ""instant, overwhelming, leaving no choice of means and no moment for deliberation."" But carrier strike groups do not reposition in fourteen days by accident. Decisions made two weeks before the first missile crosses a border are not made in the absence of deliberation. And the destruction of Kharg Island - ninety percent of Iranian crude export capacity, four thousand civilian workers - is not a military target by any definition that a majority of states, or the ICRC, or the United States' own published naval doctrine, is prepared to accept. Frost knows this. His partner and analyst, Amara Diallo, knew it before he did. From Murmansk to Moscow to Geneva to The Hague, No Moment for Deliberation follows the construction of a case designed not to win - but to stand. To build a record. To put the question into a court, onto the docket, into the permanent archive of international law, so that the next lawyer who needs it does not begin from zero. Written in February and March 2026, as the events it fictionalizes moved from scenario to headline, this novel arrives not as prediction but as examination. The law it describes is the law being invoked right now. The arguments it constructs are the arguments that will matter - in courtrooms, in legal journals, in the cases that have not yet been filed. A legal case file. And a story. Dr. Cornelis van Houte, ex-Navy, is a lawyer and military consultant for PMCs operating in Africa and Eastern-Europe

Full Product Details

9798252362922

Table of Contents

Reviews

Author Information

Tab Content 6

Countries Available