|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewThis book explains how Cervantes took advantage of neo-stoicism and skepticism to remove the authority of the Romances of Chivalry, which was a popular genre during his time. It also explains why his strategy, which would have been instantly recognizable during the period, is no longer effective: our current moral systems are significantly different from the moral systems that were influential during Cervantes' time, and consequently, what used to be self-evident is no longer the case. Therefore, this book may be useful to the literary critic interested in the philosophical foundations of Don Quijote, to the moral philosopher interested in the differences between pre-enlightenment virtue-ethics and current moral systems, and also in the field of the history of ideas. Don Quijote offers a unique opportunity to observe changes in moral thinking throughout time because it is a universal book, discussed extensively throughout out the centuries, and therefore the on-going discussion offers strong evidence to discover how morality has changed, and continues to change, through time. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Daniel LorcaPublisher: Lexington Books Imprint: Lexington Books Dimensions: Width: 16.00cm , Height: 1.90cm , Length: 23.50cm Weight: 0.422kg ISBN: 9781498522656ISBN 10: 1498522653 Pages: 168 Publication Date: 15 July 2016 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Manufactured on demand ![]() We will order this item for you from a manufactured on demand supplier. Table of Contents1. How Did Cervantes Remove the Authority of a Genre? 2. The Skeptical Story of Don Quijote and Don Quijote's Dogmatism 3. Neo-Stoicism and Don Quijote's Lack of Justice 4. Marcela, the Fictional Sage in Part I of Don Quijote 5. Don Quijote, Neo-Stoicism and the Philosophy of the Late EnlightenmentReviewsLorca sheds new light on the philosophical dimensions of Don Quijote by positing neo-stoicism and skepticism as integrated forces in the work. He demonstrates the impact of late Enlightenment readings on our current interpretation of the novel, as a corrective to excess focus on the legacy of Romanticism. His comparative analysis of the epistemological practices employed by Don Quijote and Marcela enhances our understanding of both characters and of Cervantes' parody of romance narrative. -- Barbara Simerka, Queens College, CUNY Lorca sheds new light on the philosophical dimensions of Don Quijote by positing neo-stoicism and skepticism as integrated forces in the work. He demonstrates the impact of late Enlightenment readings on our current interpretation of the novel, as a corrective to excess focus on the legacy of Romanticism. His comparative analysis of the epistemological practices employed by Don Quijote and Marcela enhances our understanding of both characters and of Cervantes' parody of romance narrative. -- Barbara Simerka, Queens College, CUNY Daniel Lorca's analysis sheds fresh, revealing light on Cervantes and the early modern philosophical discourses that inform Don Quijote. He lays out his questions and develops his arguments with admirable clarity. This is a rigorous, erudite contribution to Cervantine studies. -- Christopher Weimer, Oklahoma State University Author InformationDaniel Lorca is assistant professor of modern languages and literatures at Oakland University. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |