Overview

The phenomenon of global jihad, a transnational conflict often emerging from intra-state insurgency, highlights a weakness in states' security apparatus that non-state actors have exploited. In this study, I examine insurgencies that widen their objectives from nationalist or regional focus to transnational violent extremism - a process of scale shift - under conditions of state repression. My study shows that scale shift accelerates when state security forces repress and co-opt nationalist elements of an insurgency, insurgents in other countries support a transnational faction of the insurgency, and the transnational element becomes predominant. This suggests that the process of scale shift is characterized by decades of evolution based on transnational relationships, gradual replacement of nationalist goals, and diversification of resources to include external sources. I also find that the intervening variables of factional disunity, state repression, and state co-optation are key mechanisms for speeding and completing the scale shift.This research recommends five changes to the U.S. military approach to defeating violent extremist organizations. The first is the introduction of a scale of conflict to U.S. military doctrine in JP 3-0 with intra-state, inter-state, extra-state, non-state, and transnational scales. The second recommendation is for U.S. military doctrine to adapt its definition of insurgency to encompass the tendency of insurgencies to become transnational as a result of effective counterinsurgency. The third recommendation is the introduction of mechanisms of scale shift to explain why insurgents expand from intra-state to transnational conflict types. The fourth recommendation is that each counterinsurgency should include a transnational line of effort. The fifth recommendation is that counterterrorism and counterinsurgency targeting should focus on the relationships, in addition to the power, of an actor. For counterinsurgency to be completely effective, an additional line of effort must address factions with transnational relationships, even though these are likely to be weak compared to more powerful nationalist groups.Contents: 1. Introduction 2. Literature Review 3. Methodology, Theory, and Definitions 4. History of Chechen Insurgency 5. History of Somali Insurgency 6. Formation and Destruction of ICU 7. Al-Shabaab and Scale Shift 8. Somali Involvement with ISIS 9. Research Findings 10. ConclusionTilly and Tarrow provide a useful model for understanding scale shifts between conflict types, some mechanisms of scale shift, and VEO behavior during scale shift. They identify coordinated action, brokerage, and diffusion as the primary mechanisms explaining scale shift. Coordinated action describes two or more actors synchronizing their efforts toward common goals. Coordination is facilitated by brokerage between groups, which produces new connections between previously independent actors. Diffusion allows ideas to spread beyond their originators and provides common frames for future coordinated action and brokerage. Diffusion of transnational extremism can be facilitated indirectly by mass media, intermediaries spreading ideology and methodologies, or through personal relationships among factional groups. Tilly and Tarrow suggest that during scale shift VEOs increase their power by adopting transnational objectives, creating transnational groups, and coordinating action across international boundaries.

Full Product Details

9781726767446

Table of Contents

Reviews

Author Information

Tab Content 6

Customer Reviews

Recent Reviews

Countries Available