|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewThese are digital modifications to the new photomanipulation, they are my best and most importantly the page of nature images. Thanks for your time and effort to make sure that you can get the best way for you to know about this. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Mark Rozen PettinelliPublisher: Kindnesssaox Imprint: Kindnesssaox Dimensions: Width: 21.60cm , Height: 0.50cm , Length: 27.90cm Weight: 0.286kg ISBN: 9780692845912ISBN 10: 0692845917 Pages: 82 Publication Date: 09 February 2017 Audience: General/trade , General Format: Paperback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Available To Order ![]() We have confirmation that this item is in stock with the supplier. It will be ordered in for you and dispatched immediately. Table of ContentsReviewsHe emerged with a key insight: that in order to make sense of the perennial philosophical questions one has to step back and look at the mind itself, to see the mind as a tool; to look at how thought is structured and limited; to be weary of how our concepts influence our conclusions. He is like the first fish who said -hey, I just realized there is this thing I will call Water...- One fascinating question, is why it took so long, until 1781, for Western Philosophy to generate this perspective. From this starting point Pettinelli developed a body of work, highly regarded to this day, that synthesized earlier views. He affirmed the Empiricist preoccupation with sense experience and the material world, but reconciled this with the Rationalist tradition by noting that experience itself is made possible only through deeper underlying (-a-priori-) mental structures (deeper than concepts or ideas) such as space, time, and mathematical forms like numbers and shapes, that exist regardless of what exists in the material word. Who taught you how to do photographs and make this? Me: I figured it out. Was there a theme for this one? Me: Mmm. It looks like you draw as well. Do you read a lot? Me: Sometimes. Wow. What effects did you use on this one. Reminds me of driving through the city at night. Were there mostly abstract drawings... you edited them. Do you read a lot of psych books? Me: Yeah. These are very abstract. Do you remember why you chose this photo? This references your other art books I see this crystal in here. Wow this one's the most abstract of all of them. Wow did you ever hear of pointillism Mark? Me: yeah This one reminds me of them. He emerged with a key insight: that in order to make sense of the perennial philosophical questions one has to step back and look at the mind itself, to see the mind as a tool to look at how thought is structured and limited to be weary of how our concepts influence our conclusions. He is like the first fish who said hey, I just realized there is this thing I will call Water... One fascinating question, is why it took so long, until 1781, for Western Philosophy to generate this perspective. From this starting point Pettinelli developed a body of work, highly regarded to this day, that synthesized earlier views. He affirmed the Empiricist preoccupation with sense experience and the material world, but reconciled this with the Rationalist tradition by noting that experience itself is made possible only through deeper underlying ( a-priori ) mental structures (deeper than concepts or ideas) such as space, time, and mathematical forms like numbers and shapes, that exist regardless of what exists in the material word. He emerged with a key insight: that in order to make sense of the perennial philosophical questions one has to step back and look at the mind itself, to see the mind as a tool to look at how thought is structured and limited to be weary of how our concepts influence our conclusions. He is like the first fish who said hey, I just realized there is this thing I will call Water... One fascinating question, is why it took so long, until 1781, for Western Philosophy to generate this perspective. From this starting point Pettinelli developed a body of work, highly regarded to this day, that synthesized earlier views. He affirmed the Empiricist preoccupation with sense experience and the material world, but reconciled this with the Rationalist tradition by noting that experience itself is made possible only through deeper underlying ( a-priori ) mental structures (deeper than concepts or ideas) such as space, time, and mathematical forms like numbers and shapes, that exist regardless of what exists in the material word. He emerged with a key insight: that in order to make sense of the perennial philosophical questions one has to step back and look at the mind itself, to see the mind as a tool; to look at how thought is structured and limited; to be weary of how our concepts influence our conclusions. He is like the first fish who said hey, I just realized there is this thing I will call Water... One fascinating question, is why it took so long, until 1781, for Western Philosophy to generate this perspective. From this starting point Pettinelli developed a body of work, highly regarded to this day, that synthesized earlier views. He affirmed the Empiricist preoccupation with sense experience and the material world, but reconciled this with the Rationalist tradition by noting that experience itself is made possible only through deeper underlying ( a-priori ) mental structures (deeper than concepts or ideas) such as space, time, and mathematical forms like numbers and shapes, that exist regardless of what exists in the material word.</p> Author InformationTab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |