|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewFull Product DetailsAuthor: Philippe Hamou (Professor of Philosophy, Professor of Philosophy, Université Paris-Nanterre) , Martine Pécharman (Senior Research Fellow, Senior Research Fellow, CNRS, Paris)Publisher: Oxford University Press Imprint: Oxford University Press Dimensions: Width: 16.30cm , Height: 2.10cm , Length: 24.10cm Weight: 0.516kg ISBN: 9780198815037ISBN 10: 0198815034 Pages: 238 Publication Date: 04 July 2018 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Manufactured on demand ![]() We will order this item for you from a manufactured on demand supplier. Table of ContentsPhilippe Hamou & Martine Pécharman: Introduction 1: J. R. Milton: Locke and Descartes: The Initial Exposure 1660-1670 2: 1. Locke and Cartesian Cosmology: Locke and Cartesian Cosmology 3: Lisa Downing: Are Body and Extension the Same Thing? Locke vs Descartes (vs More) 4: James Hill: The Cartesian Element in Locke's Anti-Cartesian Conception of Body 5: Martha Brandt Bolton: Modes and Composite Material Things According to Descartes and Locke 6: Matthieu Haumesser: Virtual Existence of Ideas and Real Existence. Locke's Anti-Cartesian Ontology 7: Philippe Hamou: Locke and Descartes on Selves and Thinking Things 8: Denis Kambouchner: Locke and Descartes on Free Will 9: Catherine Wilson: Essential Religiosity in Descartes and Locke 10: Laurent Jaffro: Locke and Port Royal on Affirmation, Negation, and Other 'Postures of the Mind' 11: Andreas Blank: Cartesian Logic and Locke's Critique of Maxims 12: Nicholas Jolley: Locke and Malebranche. Intelligibility and EmpiricismReviewsThe book is a welcome contribution. The twelve papers in it resolutely set aside hackneyed labels in favour of a more nuanced examination of the many complicated ways in which Locke engages both positively and negatively with Descartes (and, to some extent, Cartesian philosophy more generally). * Matthew A. Leisinger, Emmanuel College, Cambridge, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews * The book is a welcome contribution. The twelve papers in it resolutely set aside hackneyed labels in favour of a more nuanced examination of the many complicated ways in which Locke engages both positively and negatively with Descartes (and, to some extent, Cartesian philosophy more generally). * Matthew A. Leisinger, Emmanuel College, Cambridge, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews * A good resource for those in robust philosophy programs. Summing up: Recommended * CHOICE * Author InformationPhilippe Hamou is professor of philosophy at Université Paris-Nanterre. He has published in French and English on early modern philosophy and science, with special focus on Galileo, Locke, Newton, vision, and visuality. Martine Pécharman is a Senior Research Fellow at the CNRS (CRAL, EHESS, Paris). Her main research has focused on the history of early modern logic, especially Hobbes, Port-Royal, Wallis, Locke, Condillac. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |