|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewThis book examines the evidential status and use of linguistic intuitions, a topic that has seen increased interest in recent years. Linguists use native speakers' intuitions - such as whether or not an utterance sounds acceptable - as evidence for theories about language, but this approach is not uncontroversial. The two parts of this volume draw on the most recent work in both philosophy and linguistics to explore the two major issues at the heart of the debate. Chapters in the first part address the 'justification question', critically analysing and evaluating the theoretical rationale for the evidential use of linguistic intuitions. The second part discusses recent developments in the domain of experimental syntax, focusing on the question of whether gathering intuitions experimentally is epistemically and methodologically superior to the informal methods that have traditionally been used. The volume provides valuable insights into whether and how linguistic intuitions can be used in theorizing about language, and will be of interest to graduate students and researchers in linguistics, philosophy, and cognitive science. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Samuel Schindler (Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Aarhus University) , Anna Drożdżowicz (Postdoctoral Researcher, Postdoctoral Researcher, University of Oslo) , Karen Brøcker (Affiliated Researcher, Affiliated Researcher, Aarhus University)Publisher: Oxford University Press Imprint: Oxford University Press Dimensions: Width: 16.20cm , Height: 2.30cm , Length: 24.20cm Weight: 0.638kg ISBN: 9780198840558ISBN 10: 0198840551 Pages: 318 Publication Date: 14 August 2020 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: To order ![]() Stock availability from the supplier is unknown. We will order it for you and ship this item to you once it is received by us. Table of Contents1: Karen Brøcker, Anna Drożdżowicz, and Samuel Schindler: Introduction Part I: Accounts of linguistic intuitions 2: Steven Gross: Linguistic intuitions: Error signals and the Voice of Competence 3: Georges Rey: A defence of the Voice of Competence 4: Michael Devitt: Linguistic intuitions again: A response to Gross and Rey 5: Karen Brøcker: Do generative linguists believe in a Voice of Competence? 6: John Collins: Semantic and syntactic intuitions: Two sides of the same coin 7: Anna Drożdżowicz: Intuitions about meaning, experience, and reliability 8: Carlos Santana: How we can make good use of linguistic intuitions, even if they aren't good evidence Part II: Experiments in syntax 9: Frederick J. Newmeyer: The relevance of introspective data 10: Sam Featherston: Can we build a grammar on the basis of judgments? 11: Carson T. Schütze: Acceptability ratings cannot be taken at face value 12: Jon Sprouse: A user's view of the validity of acceptability judgments as evidence for syntactic theories 13: Jana Häussler and Tom S. Juzek: inguistic intuitions and the puzzle of gradience 14: Samuel Schindler and Karen Brøcker: Experiments in syntax and philosophy: The method of choice?ReviewsEssential reading for anyone who wishes to understand the role of intuitions in language theorizing as well as how they interact with alternative methods in linguistics. * Thomas J. Hughes, Metascience * Author InformationSamuel Schindler is Associate Professor of Philosophy of Science at the Centre for Science Studies at Aarhus University in Denmark. His research focuses on methodological and epistemological issuesin the history and philosophy of science. His publications include Theoretical Virtues in Science: Uncovering Reality Through Theory (CUP, 2018). He was the PI of the project 'Intuitions in Science and Philosophy' (2016-2019), which investigated how intuitions can serve as evidence. Anna Dro:zd:zowicz is postdoctoral researcher at the University of Oslo. She received her PhD from the University of Oslo in 2015. From 2016 to 2018 she was a postdoctoral researcher on the project 'Intuitions in Science and Philosophy' at the Centre for Science Studies, Aarhus University. She works primarily on the philosophy of mind and language, but has also published papers in philosophical methodology, psycholinguistics, and the philosophy of psychiatry. Karen Brøcker holds a PhD in Science Studies and an MA and BA in Linguistics from Aarhus University. Her research focuses on theoretical linguistics and philosophy of linguistics, in particular the theoretical assumptions underlying the use of linguistic intuitions as evidence for theories of grammar. Her PhD was part of the project 'Intuitions in Science and Philosophy' at the Centre for Science Studies, Aarhus University. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |