Overview

As the United States withdraws its combat troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, politicians, foreign policy specialists, and the public are worrying about the consequences of leaving these two countries. Neither nation can be considered stable, and progress toward democracy in them - a principal aim of America and the West - is fragile at best. But, international relations scholar Mark N. Katz asks: Could ending both wars actually help the United States and its allies to overcome radical Islam in the long term? Drawing lessons from the Cold War, Katz makes the case that rather than signaling the decline of American power and influence, removing military forces from Afghanistan and Iraq puts the U.S. in a better position to counter the forces of radical Islam and ultimately win the war on terror. He explains that since both wars will likely remain intractable, for Washington to remain heavily involved in either is counter-productive. Katz argues that looking to its Cold War experience would help the U.S. find better strategies for employing America's scarce resources to deal with its adversaries now. This means that, although leaving Afghanistan and Iraq may well appear to be a victory for America's opponents in the short term-as was the case when the U.S. withdrew from Indochina-the larger battle with militant Islam can be won only by refocusing foreign and military policy away from these two quagmires. This sober, objective assessment of what went wrong in the U.S.-led wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and the ways the West can disentangle itself and still move forward draws striking parallels with the Cold War. Anyone concerned with the future of the War on Terror will find Katz's argument highly thought provoking.

Full Product Details

Author:   Mark N. Katz (Professor of Government and Politics, George Mason University)
Publisher:   Johns Hopkins University Press
Imprint:   Johns Hopkins University Press
Dimensions:   Width: 15.20cm , Height: 1.70cm , Length: 22.90cm
Weight:   0.386kg
ISBN:  

9781421405582

ISBN 10:   142140558
Pages:   168
Publication Date:   11 June 2012
Recommended Age:   From 18 years
Audience:   General/trade ,  General
Format:   Hardback
Publisher's Status:   Active
Availability:   Out of stock  
The supplier is temporarily out of stock of this item. It will be ordered for you on backorder and shipped when it becomes available.

Table of Contents

Acknowledgments Prologue: The Beginning of the End of the War on Terror? The War on Terror in Perspective The Second Decade of the War on Terror What Exactly Is the War on Terror? Understanding What Went Wrong in the First Decade Assessing the Bush Strategy Why Couldn't the United States Foster Democracy in Iraq? Why Couldn't the United States Foster Democracy in Afghanistan? Democratization and the Legacy of History in the Muslim World Assessing the Obama Strategy Opportunities after Withdrawal Consequences of Withdrawing from Iraq and Afghanistan Regional Opposition Radical Repression Rifts among the Radicals Withdrawal Need Not Be Defeat Beyond Iraq and Afghanistan Regional and Local Conflicts in the War on Terror The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Iran Yemen Pakistan Decoupling Regional and Local Conflicts from the War on Terror New Factors and Broader Contexts The Death of Osama bin Laden The Arab Spring The Geopolitical Context The Historical Context The Bush and Obama Legacies Works Cited Index

Reviews

Katz's largely objective and thoughtful analysis offers much to consider. Publishers Weekly 2012

As the U.S. searches for a way forward, Katz's largely objective and thoughtful analysis offers much to consider. Publishers Weekly 2012

Author Information

Mark N. Katz is a professor of government and politics at George Mason University. He has authored several books, including Russia and Arabia: Soviet Foreign Policy toward the Arabian Peninsula, also published by Johns Hopkins.

Tab Content 6

Author Website:  

Countries Available

All regions