|
|
|||
|
||||
OverviewIn order to be confirmed to a lifetime appointment on the federal bench, all district and circuit court nominees must appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee for a confirmation hearing. Most commonly, nominees field a handful of questions by two senators, yet some nominees receive over 150 questions by 10 or more senators. Lower court judges make up approximately 98% of permanent federal judgeships and their cases encompass a variety of policy areas as they interpret and apply the Constitution, laws, and precedents of the United States. The authors of It’s Not Personal analyzed transcripts for all district and circuit court confirmation hearings between 1993 and 2012. They found that the time-consuming practice of confirmation hearings for district and circuit nominees provides an important venue in which senators can advocate on behalf of their policy preferences and bolster their chances of being reelected. The variation in lower court nominees’ experiences before the Judiciary Committee exists because senators pursue these goals in different ways, depending on the level of controversy surrounding a nominee. Studying confirmation hearings improves our understanding of the process by which individuals gain lifetime seats on the federal bench, positions from which they can influence the development of law. Full Product DetailsAuthor: Logan Dancey , Kjersten Rya Nelson , Eve Megan RingsmuthPublisher: The University of Michigan Press Imprint: The University of Michigan Press Weight: 0.435kg ISBN: 9780472131839ISBN 10: 0472131834 Pages: 210 Publication Date: 30 April 2020 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: In stock We have confirmation that this item is in stock with the supplier. It will be ordered in for you and dispatched immediately. Table of ContentsReviewsThis book offers a really interesting, in-depth exploration of lower federal court confirmation hearings and the goals of the senators participating in them. The authors illuminate in rich detail how senators pursue policy and electoral goals while also exercising their constitutional advise and consent function. --Amy Steigerwalt, Georgia State University An outstanding contribution to our understanding of both judicial and congressional politics. In addition to providing substantial insight into the selection of lower federal court judges, it is an excellent example of how to bridge the divide between quantitative and qualitative approaches to political science and law. --Paul M. Collins Jr., University of Massachusetts, Amherst Author InformationLogan Dancey is Assistant Professor of Government at Wesleyan University. Kjersten R. Nelson is Associate Professor of Criminal Justice and Political Science at North Dakota State University. Eve M. Ringsmuth is Associate Professor of Political Science at Oklahoma State University. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |