|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewThis book studies the reactions of India, Brazil, and South Africa the three main non-proliferation actors of the Global South to Iran's nuclear program. Their responses are explained and situated in wider foreign policy context. Full Product DetailsAuthor: M. OndercoPublisher: Palgrave Macmillan Imprint: Palgrave Pivot Dimensions: Width: 14.00cm , Height: 1.10cm , Length: 21.60cm Weight: 0.299kg ISBN: 9781137499066ISBN 10: 1137499060 Pages: 107 Publication Date: 07 July 2015 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: In Print ![]() This item will be ordered in for you from one of our suppliers. Upon receipt, we will promptly dispatch it out to you. For in store availability, please contact us. Table of Contents1. Introduction 2. The Global South, Nuclear Politics and Iran 3. India 4. Brazil 5. South Africa 6. ConclusionReviewsWhy do some states that claim to support non-proliferation nonetheless refuse to support non-proliferation measures, such as sanctions against Iran? Michal Onderco's book provides an insightful window into this question, arguing that ideational considerations shape state foreign policy responses just as much as material factors. Onderco's book is an important work that informs the fields of nuclear politics and comparative foreign policy more generally. - Maria Rost Rublee, Australian National University, Australia Michal Onderco's illuminating book describes the similarities and differences between the foreign policies of Brazil, India, and South Africa vis-a-vis the Iranian nuclear program. The reader learns a lot on how these rising powers view themselves in the future constellation of world politics. - Tom Sauer, University of Antwerp, Belgium Why do some states that claim to support non-proliferation nonetheless refuse to support non-proliferation measures, such as sanctions against Iran? Michal Onderco's book provides an insightful window into this question, arguing that ideational considerations shape state foreign policy responses just as much as material factors. Onderco's book is an important work that informs the fields of nuclear politics and comparative foreign policy more generally. - Maria Rost Rublee, Australian National University, Australia Michal Onderco's illuminating book describes the similarities and differences between the foreign policies of Brazil, India, and South Africa vis-a-vis the Iranian nuclear program. The reader learns a lot on how these rising powers view themselves in the future constellation of world politics. - Tom Sauer, University of Antwerp, Belgium Why do some states that claim to support non-proliferation nonetheless refuse to support non-proliferation measures, such as sanctions against Iran? Michal Onderco's book provides an insightful window into this question, arguing that ideational considerations shape state foreign policy responses just as much as material factors. Onderco's book is an important work that informs the fields of nuclear politics and comparative foreign policy more generally. - Maria Rost Rublee, Australian National University, Australia Michal Onderco's illuminating book describes the similarities and differences between the foreign policies of Brazil, India, and South Africa vis-a-vis the Iranian nuclear program. The reader learns a lot on how these rising powers view themselves in the future constellation of world politics. - Tom Sauer, University of Antwerp, Belgium ""Why do some states that claim to support non-proliferation nonetheless refuse to support non-proliferation measures, such as sanctions against Iran? Michal Onderco's book provides an insightful window into this question, arguing that ideational considerations shape state foreign policy responses just as much as material factors. Onderco's book is an important work that informs the fields of nuclear politics and comparative foreign policy more generally."" - Maria Rost Rublee, Australian National University, Australia ""Michal Onderco's illuminating book describes the similarities and differences between the foreign policies of Brazil, India, and South Africa vis-à-vis the Iranian nuclear program. The reader learns a lot on how these rising powers view themselves in the future constellation of world politics."" - Tom Sauer, University of Antwerp, Belgium Author InformationMichal Onderco is Max Weber Fellow at the European University Institute, Florence, Italy. He received his PhD in political science from Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands. He was previously a Fulbright Visiting Researcher at Columbia University, New York, USA. His research is focused on the politics of international institutions, the Global South, and nuclear proliferation. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |