|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewFull Product DetailsAuthor: James HeinzenPublisher: University of Pittsburgh Press Imprint: University of Pittsburgh Press Dimensions: Width: 15.50cm , Height: 2.00cm , Length: 23.50cm Weight: 0.454kg ISBN: 9780822961758ISBN 10: 082296175 Pages: 312 Publication Date: 15 February 2004 Audience: Professional and scholarly , Professional & Vocational Format: Paperback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: Out of stock ![]() The supplier is temporarily out of stock of this item. It will be ordered for you on backorder and shipped when it becomes available. Table of ContentsReviews<p> James W. Heinzen's work fills a significant gap in the extensive historiography of the New Economic Policy (NEP) . . . The book studies the organization and staffing of NKZem RSFSR, offers some memorable portraits of its leading figures, especially its head, Alexander Petrovich Smirnov, and delves into the complexity of policy making in this era and the clash of institutional interests that had a major impact on policy. . . . Heinzen makes a convincing case that Smirnov and the specialists in NKZem RSFSR were one of the major sources of ideas and policies for the 'Rightists' within the party leadership. . . . The book is distinguished by its thoroughness, and by its cool and balanced judgment. . . . This study brings out the full complexity of the Bolshevik regime, its dilemmas, and its internal contraditions. <br> --The American Historical Review Makes a significant and lasting contribution to our understanding of the history and development of the Russo-Soviet state. Don K. Rowney, Bowling Green State University "James W. Heinzen’s work fills a significant gap in the extensive historiography of the New Economic Policy (NEP) . . . The book studies the organization and staffing of NKZem RSFSR, offers some memorable portraits of its leading figures, especially its head, Alexander Petrovich Smirnov, and delves into the complexity of policy making in this era and the clash of institutional interests that had a major impact on policy. . . . Heinzen makes a convincing case that Smirnov and the specialists in NKZem RSFSR were one of the major sources of ideas and policies for the ‘Rightists’ within the party leadership. . . . The book is distinguished by its thoroughness, and by its cool and balanced judgment. . . . This study brings out the full complexity of the Bolshevik regime, its dilemmas, and its internal contraditions."""" - American Historical Review """"James W. Heinzen's fine study of the Commissariat of Agriculture (Narkomzem) focuses on the contradictory processes of Soviet state building in the countryside. Particularly important are Heinzen's insights into the activities of Aleksandr P. Smirnov, a major champion and theorist of the New Economic Policy. Smirnov and the Commissariat have remained relatively obscure to historians of the period who, while concentrating on the party, have underrated the complex relations between state commissariats, the Communist Party, and the population. . . . Heinzen makes effective use of state and party archives to detail the Commissariat's affiliation with the rightt wing of the party, emphasizing both the degree to which the right was entrenched in the state bureaucracy, and, paradoxically, its vulnerability even at the height of NEP. . . . Heinzen's clear, well-documented book makes a substantial contribution to the scholarship on the early Soviet state."""" - Slavic Review """"This is an extremely valuable and well-researched account of an understudied aspect of Russian post-revolutionary history, skillfully weaving together institutional, economic and political history."""" - Revolutionary Russia """"No other book has taken so close a look at the arguements about peasant land use that were centered in the commissariat in this period. . . . Highly recommended."""" - Choice """"In coming to power and surviving a devastating civil war, the Bolsheviks faced the daunting task of working out and implementing ideologically inspired policies to transform the underdeveloped Soviet countryside. . . . Avoiding neat generalizations, Heinzen does justice to the complexity of the period that ended with forced collectivization, a purge of Narkomzem, and the Stalin faction’s consolidation of power."""" - Donald J. Raleigh, University of North Carolina """"Makes a significant and lasting contribution to our understanding of the history and development of the Russo-Soviet state."""" - Don K. Rowney, Bowling Green State University" <p> Makes a significant and lasting contribution to our understanding of the history and development of the Russo-Soviet state. <br> --Don K. Rowney, Bowling Green State University Author InformationJames W. Heinzen is Professor of History at Rowan University in Glassboro, New Jersey. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |