|
![]() |
|||
|
||||
OverviewFull Product DetailsAuthor: Michael Klenk (Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands)Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd Imprint: Routledge Weight: 0.453kg ISBN: 9780367343200ISBN 10: 0367343207 Pages: 270 Publication Date: 16 January 2020 Audience: College/higher education , Tertiary & Higher Education , Undergraduate Format: Hardback Publisher's Status: Active Availability: In Print ![]() This item will be ordered in for you from one of our suppliers. Upon receipt, we will promptly dispatch it out to you. For in store availability, please contact us. Table of ContentsChange in Moral View: Higher-Order Evidence and Moral Epistemology Michael Klenk Part I: Higher-Order Evidence against Morality 1. Evolutionary Debunking, Self-Defeat and All the Evidence Silvan Wittwer 2. Moral Intuitions Between Higher-Order Evidence and Wishful Thinking Norbert Paulo 3. Debunking Objective Consequentialism: The Challenge of Knowledge-Centric Anti-Luck Epistemology Paul Silva 4. Disagreement, Indirect Defeat, and Higher-Order Evidence Olle Risberg & Folke Tersman Part II: Rebutting Higher-Order Evidence against Morality 5. Higher-Order Defeat in Realist Moral Epistemology Brian C. Barnett 6. Moral Peer Disagreement and the Limits of Higher-Order Evidence Marco Tiozzo 7. Debunking Scepticism Michael Huemer Part III: Broader Implications of Higher-Order Evidence in Moral Epistemology 8. Moral Testimony as Higher-Order Evidence Marcus Lee, Neil Sinclair, & Jon Robson 9. Higher-Order Defeat in Collective Moral Epistemology J. Adam Carter & Dario Mortini 10. The Fragile Epistemology of Fanaticism Joshua DiPaolo Part IV: Permissible Epistemic Attitudes in Response to Higher-Order Evidence in Moral Epistemology 11. How Rational Level-Splitting Beliefs Can Help You Respond to Moral Disagreement Margaret Greta Turnbull & Eric Sampson 12. Epistemic Non-Factualism and Methodology Justin Clarke-DoaneReviewsIn sum, this is a rich collection of essays from which researchers and students in both epistemology and moral philosophy will benefit. It both deepens and broadens our understanding of higher-order evidence, disagreement, and debunking arguments, and I expect several of the essays in this collection will influence future work of these issues. - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews """In sum, this is a rich collection of essays from which researchers and students in both epistemology and moral philosophy will benefit. It both deepens and broadens our understanding of higher-order evidence, disagreement, and debunking arguments, and I expect several of the essays in this collection will influence future work of these issues."" – Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews" Author InformationMichael Klenk works at the intersection of metaethics, epistemology, and moral psychology. His published papers on these topics in Synthese, Ratio, the Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, and the Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, among others. He works at Delft University of Technology and held visiting positions at St. Gallen and Stanford University. Tab Content 6Author Website:Countries AvailableAll regions |